What part of Mars Rover or Mars satellite has this cone object fallen from?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Julian_M
  • Start date Start date
Julian_M
Messages
24
Reaction score
4
Screenshot 2026-03-09 081150.webp


Note the cone shaped object partially embedded in the surface at the lower right, see original at:

https://mars.nasa.gov/raw_images/1108577/

What part of any Rover has it? If it fell down from one of the orbiting Mars satellite. Won't the reentry burn it? I presume Mars has totally no atmosphere so any object falling into it won't get burnt?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexB23
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Julian_M said:
View attachment 370059

Note the cone shaped object partially embedded in the surface at the lower right, see original at:

https://mars.nasa.gov/raw_images/1108577/

What part of any Rover has it? If it fell down from one of the orbiting Mars satellite. Won't the reentry burn it? I presume Mars has totally no atmosphere so any object falling into it won't get burnt?
Could this be the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Mars Descent Imager (MARDI)? That has a cone shape.

1773016679042.webp


https://www.msss.com/science/msl-mardi-instrument-description.php
 
Julian_M said:
Your link gives this raw image at NASA, which is a different photo from the one you showed, and contains no cone. Where did your photo actually come from?
1773018697337.webp

EDIT: Sorry, I spoke too soon! The cone is at the right side below the middle. So your question is definitely valid! But where did the color version come from?
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, AlexB23 and berkeman
renormalize said:
Your link gives this raw image at NASA, which is a different photo from the one you showed, and contains no cone. Where did your photo actually come from?
View attachment 370063
Did he find the photo from a news article instead of NASA? Sometimes the lower quality news articles, especially tabloids, may Photoshop in objects or use AI to get clicks
 
Google images says:
This scene was captured by the rover's Mast Camera (Mastcam) during its mission to study the geology of Mars in 2022.
NASA has not officially commented on this mysterious cylindrical object.
 
renormalize said:
Your link gives this raw image at NASA, which is a different photo from the one you showed, and contains no cone. Where did your photo actually come from?
View attachment 370063
EDIT: Sorry, I spoke too soon! The cone is at the right side below the middle. So your question is definitely valid! But where did the color version come from?

The colored photos can be found in this:



mars_object1.webp



mars_object2.webp



mars_object3.webp



Is it possible it is not a cone but a long pole with rest buried? Where is the ESA rover crash site, could a part fall down and got embedded? If it came from the satellite, is there no re-entry burn in Mars?
 
Julian_M said:
If it came from the satellite, is there no re-entry burn in Mars?
Mars atmo is ~.6kPA - less than 1% of an Earth atmo. It's effectively vacuum.

Mars orbital velocity is roughly 3.5km/s. ChatGPT thinks (for what that's worth) even a small object would impact at about 3km/s. So, virtually no aero-braking.

The bigger question is how would it get embedded in otherwise undisturbed Mars regolith, instead of an impact crater?

ChatGPT thinks it would vapourize on impact and leave a 50cm crater in loose regolith. I wouldn't put much stock in an AI answer except in an orders-of-magnitude sense of ruling out a re-entry object from orbit.
 
Last edited:
Julian_M said:
If it came from the satellite, is there no re-entry burn in Mars?
By definition, if you never left Mars earlier, re-entry would be impossible.

Oxidation is reduced in a 95% CO2 atmosphere. The CO2 needs to be atomised before the oxygen can be available.

It is possible that the object is a short tube, remaining after other parts have been ablated from a craft during the fall. It seems to be partly buried in Martian loess. That would suggest it has been through a dust-storm, which might date it. There are no wheel tracks next to it, so it is unlikely to have been a part of the rover.

What are the chances of finding something like that near the rover landing place? If it was part of the drogue parachute system, then it could survive atmospheric entry, and be found close to the lander.

If it is from a different mission, and one has been found so soon, then one might expect there to be many similar things scattered about the surface of Mars.
 
  • #10
Hey NASA! Been four years. You ever gonna weigh in on this??

1773071725578.webp
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K