MHB What Percentage of the Whole Group Answered Yes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter None Too Bright
  • Start date Start date
None Too Bright
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
But as my username indicates...this is why I'm here.

The problem:

52% of a group take a survey. 16% of that 52% answer Yes to a specific question. What I want to know is, statistically, what would the 16% be if all 100% of the group had taken the survey?

I know it will be less than 32%, and I know it is probably a pathetically simple calculation. To most of you. To most of you it's probably pre-SCHOOL maths. But not to me, and I would like to understand what the calculation is.

I'm 55, English, I took the standard UK maths qualification (O-level) twice, when I was 14 and 15, had my own teacher for 9 months prior to the 2nd attempt, and I got Ungraded each time. That's what you're up against.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
None Too Bright said:
But as my username indicates...this is why I'm here.

The problem:

52% of a group take a survey. 16% of that 52% answer Yes to a specific question. What I want to know is, statistically, what would the 16% be if all 100% of the group had taken the survey?

I know it will be less than 32%, and I know it is probably a pathetically simple calculation. To most of you. To most of you it's probably pre-SCHOOL maths. But not to me, and I would like to understand what the calculation is.

I'm 55, English, I took the standard UK maths qualification (O-level) twice, when I was 14 and 15, had my own teacher for 9 months prior to the 2nd attempt, and I got Ungraded each time. That's what you're up against.

Thanks in advance.

Hi there, :)

I think what you want to find in this question is the percentage of people who answer "yes" to the question. In other words given a sample of 100 people how many would answer "yes" to the question.

If there are 100 people 52 of them take the survey. Similarly, if there are 100 people who take the survey 16 of them answer yes to the specific question. Therefore if there are 52 people who take the survey the number of people who answer yes to the question will be, $52\times \frac{16}{100}$. When I do these kinda questions I used to write them down in the following way,

\[100\mbox{ people}\rightarrow 16\mbox{ answer yes}\]

\[\Rightarrow 52 \mbox{ people}\rightarrow 52\times\frac{16}{100}\mbox{ answer yes}\]

Therefore the number of people who answer yes to the question is, \[52\times\frac{16}{100}=8.32\]

Note that this is the amount of people out of the 100 people who answer "yes" to the question. Therefore as a percentage it would be, 8.32%.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top