What represents the charge on a capacitor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Charge
AI Thread Summary
In a DC circuit with a 9V battery, a 10 kΩ resistor, and a 100 μF capacitor, the charge on the capacitor is represented by the excess electrons on its plates, calculated as the number of electrons multiplied by the elementary charge. Despite the low drift velocity of electrons in copper, the high density of free electrons allows sufficient charge to flow, enabling the capacitor to charge in about 5 seconds. The total charge stored in the capacitor depends on its capacitance and the applied voltage, with higher capacitance requiring more charge for the same voltage. The discussion emphasizes that drift velocity does not accurately reflect the speed at which electrons move, as they have much higher velocities in the metal lattice. Understanding the relationship between charge, voltage, and the number of free electrons is crucial for grasping capacitor behavior in circuits.
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
356
Reaction score
33
TL;DR Summary
The electrons involved in the current in a copper wire have a relatively low drift velocity. Yet capacitors reach full charge relatively fast. Trying to reconcile these two facts.
Consider a simple DC circuit containing a 9V battery, a switch, a 10 kΩ resister and a 100 μF capacitor all in series. When the switch is thrown, it will take basically 5 seconds for the capacitor to reach full charge.

Based on what I have read online, the charge on the above capacitor is represented by an abundance of electrons on one of the plates. The total charge being the number of electrons times the elementary charge e.

I have also read that electrons have a very low, around 1 mm per second, drift velocity in copper wires. That most of the energy in the current is actually from EM waves in the wire. So, based on that, I does not seem that enough electrons would reach the capacitor plate during the 5 seconds of charging. So, what represents the charge on the capacitor?
Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are somewhere around 1019 atoms in a cubic millimeter of copper, each of which has at least one free valence electron which means there are a lot of electrons in even a small section of wire that can move about under an applied voltage. So even a small drift velocity can result in a huge electric current.

LarryS said:
That most of the energy in the current is actually from EM waves in the wire.
It is true that the energy delivered by a circuit is not dependent solely on the current. A load requiring 100 watts of power can often be designed to get that wattage from 10 volts and 10 amps, 5 volts and 20 amps, 20 volts and 5 amps, or whatever combination of V times A that you desire as long as it equals 100.

Not only that, but you can step up/down both the voltage and the amperage at will. A load that requires 10 amps can connect to a circuit that delivers only 5 amps by using a transformer or other means of changing the voltage/current.

LarryS said:
So, based on that, I does not seem that enough electrons would reach the capacitor plate during the 5 seconds of charging. So, what represents the charge on the capacitor?
The charge on the capacitor is the number of excess electric charges on each plate (or equivalent if you don't have a capacitor with 2 plates). This number depends on the voltage and capacitance of said capacitor. A capacitor with a very high capacitance requires more charge to reach the same voltage as a capacitor of less capacitance, and increasing the voltage of a capacitor requires increasing the charge stored on that capacitor (at least in simple capacitors).

LarryS said:
So, based on that, I does not seem that enough electrons would reach the capacitor plate during the 5 seconds of charging.
Your example circuit has a maximum current of less than 1 milliamp, and your capacitor holds only 0.9 millicoulombs of charge. However, a drift velocity of 1 mm/s through a copper wire with a cross sectional area of 1 mm2 represents roughly 13 amps, enough to charge your capacitor in milliseconds.

Don't underestimate the power of 10xx numbers of electric charges moving at slow velocities.

Finally, remember that drift velocity is not the 'true' velocity that electrons move at. They are like air molecules in a calm breeze. The breeze may be slow but the individual molecules are bouncing around at half the speed of sound. Similarly, electrons in a metal are moving about the metal lattice at enormous velocities. At absolute zero the velocity of an electron of copper in the highest occupied state has a velocity (called the fermi velocity) of about 1,570,000 m/s. So the electric current you see in a circuit is simply the result of a very slight reduction in the velocity of electrons going one way through the circuit and the slight increase in velocity of electrons going the other way.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, Oldman too, LarryS and 3 others
Drakkith said:
Don't underestimate the power of 10xx numbers of electric charges moving at slow velocities.
It's the same sort of thing that makes multi-lane highways so good at passing vast amounts of traffic. You have to do the sums with the right figures before you can overcome 'wrong' intuitive conclusions.

If you think in terms of Coulombs and Volts and then how many valence electrons are present in a piece of copper, you can get an idea of the actual numbers involved. It's instructive to calculate the Energy (Work) and Forces involved in bringing two charges of +1C together from Infinity to a distance of 1m from each other. (The formulae are readily available all over the place.)
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, LarryS and Drakkith
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top