Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around participants sharing their current work experiences in relation to their fields of study, particularly in engineering and related disciplines. It includes reflections on the relevance of their jobs to their academic backgrounds and the implications of working outside one's original field of study.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express interest in a poll to gauge how many members work in their field of study versus other fields.
- One participant mentions being unemployed due to medical disability but engages in gardening to supplement their food supply.
- Another participant works in the restaurant industry, which is unrelated to their academic background.
- There is a question raised about the absence of a "None" option in the poll, leading to clarification that "Other" was intended as a catch-all category.
- Multiple participants seek to define what constitutes "in original field of study," with one noting their transition from electrical engineering to control systems engineering, suggesting a connection between the two.
- Another participant argues that control systems engineering encompasses various engineering disciplines, including chemical and mechanical engineering, and highlights the diversity of knowledge required in the field.
- There is a discussion about the interpretation of "outside your original field," with some defining it as working in a field unrelated to their dissertation topic.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on what constitutes working "in original field of study," with some arguing for a broader interpretation that includes related fields, while others maintain a stricter definition. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise definitions and implications of these terms.
Contextual Notes
Participants' definitions of "original field of study" and "outside your original field" vary, indicating a lack of consensus on these terms. The discussion also reflects personal experiences that may not be representative of broader trends.