What values of m maximize the utility function for a consumer buying two goods?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Knore88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Utility
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around maximizing a utility function for a consumer purchasing two goods, given their prices and a budget constraint. Participants explore the application of Lagrange multipliers to derive optimal quantities and the maximum utility value as functions of the budget.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the utility function U(x, y) = (x + y)(y + 2) and sets up the problem using Lagrange multipliers to find optimal quantities x* and y* as functions of m.
  • Another participant reformulates the utility function and constraint, deriving expressions for y in terms of x and m, and confirms agreement on the initial steps.
  • A later reply computes the utility function U(x(m), y(m)) and questions whether any point on the constraint can be chosen to verify maximization.
  • Participants explore different points on the constraint, such as setting x=0 or x=2, to compare utility values and determine conditions under which one utility expression is greater than another.
  • One participant concludes that the maximum utility occurs at U_max = (m + 8)² / 96 for the range 8 ≤ m ≤ 40, while another participant challenges the selection of boundary points and suggests finding alternative points on the constraint.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the formulation of the utility function and the use of Lagrange multipliers, but there is ongoing debate regarding the selection of points on the constraint and the conditions for maximizing utility. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal method for confirming the maximum utility value.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the validity of solutions for specific values of m and the implications of boundary conditions on the utility maximization process. There are unresolved mathematical steps related to confirming the maximum utility across different points on the constraint.

Knore88
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A consumer spends a positive amount (m) in order to buy (x) units of one good at the price of 6 per unit, and (y) units of a different good at the price of 10 per unit. The consumer chooses (x) and (y) to maximize the utility function

U(x, y) = (x + y)(y + 2).

I need to find the optimal quantities x* and y*, as well as the Lagrange multiplier, all as functions of m.

FOC:

$${L}_{x}$$ = y + 2 - 6$$\lambda$$ = 0 (i)

$${L}_{y}$$ = x + 2y + 2 - 10$$\lambda$$ = 0 (ii)

6x + 10y - m = 0 (iii)

From (i): $$\lambda$$ = $$\frac{y + 2}{6}$$

From (ii): $$\lambda$$ = $$\frac{x + 2y + 2}{10}$$

$$\therefore$$

x*(m) = $$\frac{5}{3}$$ - $$\frac{m}{24}$$

y*(m) = $$\frac{m}{8}$$ - 1

$$\lambda$$*(m) = $$\frac{m}{48}$$ + $$\frac{1}{6}$$

Next I need to find the maximum utility value as a function of m.

I plugged the values for x* and y* into the utility function and obtained

U(m or m*?) = $$\frac{m(m + 16)}{96}$$ + $$\frac{2}{3}$$ ?

Finally, I need to find for what values of m this solution is valid. I'm not quite sure how to do this part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, we have the objective function:

$$U(x,y)=(x+y)(y+2)=xy+2x+y^2+2y$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y)=m-6x-10y=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain:

$$y+2=\lambda(-6)$$

$$x+2y+2=\lambda(-10)$$

From this we obtain:

$$-\lambda=\frac{y+2}{6}=\frac{x+2y+2}{10}$$

And this implies:

$$y=4-3x$$

Substituting into the constraint, we obtain:

$$m-6x-10(4-3x)=0$$

$$x(m)=\frac{40-m}{24}$$

Hence:

$$y(m)=4-3\left(\frac{40-m}{24}\right)=4+\frac{m-40}{8}=\frac{m-8}{8}$$

Okay, we agree so far. Now you need to compute:

$$U(x(m),y(m))$$

And then find another point on the constraint to make certain you have maximized $U$.
 
U(x(m), y(m)) = U($$\frac{40-m}{24}$$, $$\frac{m-8}{8}$$) = $$\frac{{m}^{2}+16m+64}{96}$$

Can I choose any point on the constraint? Say

y = 10 - 2x

x(m) = $$\frac{100-m}{14}$$

y(m) = $$\frac{-30-m}{7}$$

U(x(m), y(m)) = $$\frac{{3m}^{2}+8m-640}{98}$$

Original is larger until a certain point?
 
I get:

$$U(x(m),y(m))=\left(\frac{40-m}{24}+\frac{m-8}{8}\right)\left(\frac{m-8}{8}+2\right)=\frac{m+8}{12}\cdot\frac{m+8}{8}=\frac{(m+8)^2}{96}$$

This agrees with your result...so far so good.

Now, if we are going to pick another point on the constraint, let's examine the constraint:

$$m-6x-10y=0$$

Suppose we let $x=0$, then we have:

$$m-10y=0\implies y=\frac{m}{10}$$

And so we find:

$$U\left(0,\frac{m}{10}\right)=\left(0+\frac{m}{10}\right)\left(\frac{m}{10}+2\right)=\frac{m}{10}\cdot\frac{m+20}{10}=\frac{m(m+20)}{100}$$

So, what we want to do here is make certain that for $0<m$, we have:

$$\frac{(m+8)^2}{96}>\frac{m(m+20)}{100}$$

$$\frac{(m+8)^2}{24}>\frac{m(m+20)}{25}$$

$$25(m+8)^2>24m(m+20)$$

$$25m^2+400m+1600>24m^2+480m$$

$$m^2-80m+1600>0$$

$$(m-40)^2>0$$

This is true for $\{m\,|\,m\ne40\}$

This makes sense, because when $m=40$, then $x(m)=0$, which is the other point on the constraint we picked. Looking at $x(m)$ and $y(m)$, we see we require:

$$8\le m\le40$$

Can you pick another point on the constraint that avoids being on this boundary?
 
I tried at

$$y = 0$$

$$U(\frac{m}{6}, 0 )$$

ends at

$${(m-8)}^{2}$$ (So on boundary)

Also tried

$$x = 2$$

$$U(2, \frac{m-12}{10})$$

ends at

$${-95m}^{2}-1536m-6080$$

both outside of the boundary?
 
Okay, if we let $x=2$, then we have:

$$y=\frac{m-12}{10}$$

And we find:

$$U\left(2,\frac{m-12}{10}\right)=\left(2+\frac{m-12}{10}\right)\left(\frac{m-12}{10}+2\right)=\frac{(m+8)^2}{100}$$

And so we require:

$$\frac{(m+8)^2}{96}>\frac{(m+8)^2}{100}$$

This obviously holds for all $0<m$, and so we can state:

$$U_{\max}=\frac{(m+8)^2}{96}$$ where $8\le m\le40$.
 
Thank you for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K