What Velocity Is Needed to Escape Earth's Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zephyrous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the escape velocity required for an object to overcome Earth's gravity. The key concepts include Newton's Second Law and Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation. Participants highlight that using energy conservation simplifies the problem, allowing for a straightforward calculation of escape velocity without advanced calculus. The concept of escape velocity is confirmed as a fundamental topic in physics, with various methods available for its derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's Second Law
  • Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation
  • Basic principles of energy conservation
  • Understanding of differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of escape velocity using energy conservation principles.
  • Study the application of differential equations in gravitational problems.
  • Explore the Wikipedia article on escape velocity for additional insights.
  • Learn about potential energy and its role in motion under gravitational forces.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the calculations behind escape velocity and its implications in space travel.

zephyrous
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A question I made up myself:
With what velocity would an object need to be launched at to totally overcome gravity of the Earth (to have a constant velocity out in space somewhere.) Neglecting other planets, atmosphere friction, etc.


Homework Equations


Newton's Second Law
Newton's Universal law of gravitation


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured mass would be negligable if I combined N2L and NGrav and said:

F=ma=G*m*(earth's mass)*(r^-2)

So acceleration is -G(mass earth)(r(t)^-2)

But the thing is that I want to launch this baby so fast that "R" is a function of time. So when I integrate over a time differential I run into problems, because I want to integrate from t=0 to t="t" so what pops out for velocity is g(mass earth)/(r(t))- g(mass earth)/(earth's radius) plus initial velocity if you will.

I don't even know if this is correct, and I know if I take the next step to get to position I will get into natural logarithms and I'd really not trust myself then. I guess whenever I get to my position equation then that becomes my "r(t)" and I just have myself a differential equation of some sort.

I'm sure this problem has been done before and I'm almost certain it takes differential equation even at the most simple level. Does anyone know of a basic explanation of how to calculate this that only uses relatively simple undergraduate calculus and physics? I know it's connected to the topics of trajectory motion but I'm guessing the solution is more complicated than the typical "throw the ball in the air how high will it go?" brand of problems.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with potential energy? The problem is trivially easy to do if you use energy conservation - no calculus required. For inspiration, take a look at the Wikipedia article on escape velocity.

Alternatively, you can do it by solving the differential equation you obtained. It's a little more complicated that way, but it's an interesting exercise (and it's necessary if you want to know how much time it takes the object to reach a certain height).
 
I figured it out!
I guess it's a concept called escape velocity and it can be derived a few different ways.
Very Cool!
 
diazona said:
Are you familiar with potential energy? The problem is trivially easy to do if you use energy conservation - no calculus required. For inspiration, take a look at the Wikipedia article on escape velocity.

Alternatively, you can do it by solving the differential equation you obtained. It's a little more complicated that way, but it's an interesting exercise (and it's necessary if you want to know how much time it takes the object to reach a certain height).

Yep! very cool
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
917
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K