When is Â(r) Ψ(r) = ⟨r | Â | Ψ⟩?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation Â(r) Ψ(r) = ⟨r |  | Ψ⟩ is established as a formal definition in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of position eigenstates and operators acting on Hilbert spaces. The discussion clarifies that when the operator  acts on a state Ψ, it can be expressed as an integral involving the position eigenstate and the wave function. The notation used for operators acting on function spaces, such as Â(r), is highlighted as unconventional but necessary for clarity in quantum mechanics. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding the implications of this notation for accurate mathematical representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals, including operators and eigenstates
  • Understanding of Hilbert spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with bra-ket notation and its applications
  • Basic knowledge of complex-valued functions in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of position eigenstates in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the mathematical formalism of operators in Hilbert spaces
  • Explore the implications of operator notation in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between wave functions and their corresponding operators
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
Wikipedia says that the equation in the title is defined to be true.


1748203018543.webp



But is it true always?

Working with the right-hand side,

$$\langle \mathbf r\vert\hat A\vert\Psi\rangle=\int\langle \mathbf r\vert\hat A\vert\mathbf r'\rangle\langle\mathbf r'\vert\Psi\rangle\ d\mathbf r'$$

If we assume that ##\langle \mathbf r\vert\hat A\vert\mathbf r'\rangle=\hat A(\mathbf r)\delta(\mathbf{r-r'})##, then above expression collapses to ## \hat A(\mathbf r)\Psi(\mathbf r)##. But how to show this in general?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conventionally
\psi(r)=<r|\psi>
So
\phi(r)=<r|\phi>=<r|\hat{A}|\psi>
where
\hat{A}|\psi>=|\phi>
So I prefer the notation for the definition
[\hat{A}\psi](r)=\hat{A}\psi(r) \equiv <r|\hat{A}|\psi>
with no (r) for A. I have no idea what ##\hat{A}(r)## could mean.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Albertus Magnus, LightPhoton, Demystifier and 1 other person
LightPhoton said:
Wikipedia says that the equation in the title is defined to be true.


View attachment 361447


But is it true always?
It's worth noting the formalism here. We start with ##r## as the coordinate(s) of a point in space. I.e. ##r \in \mathbb R^3##. And we have ##|r\rangle## as the position eigenstate (or eigenket) associated with that point. We also have some state ##|\Psi \rangle##.

Now, we can define a complex-valued function (on ##\mathbb R^3##) by:
$$\Psi(r) \equiv \langle r|\Psi \rangle$$Where ##\langle r|## is the bra associated with the eigenket ##|r\rangle##.

Next, we have some operator, ##\hat A##, that acts on the Hilbert space of states/kets. From this we can define an operator, ##\hat A(r)## in this notation, on our function space of complex-valued functions, using:
$$[\hat A(r)\Psi](r) \equiv \langle r|\hat A|\Psi \rangle$$Note that this notation is slightly odd and it would be more usual to write something like ##\hat A'## or ##\hat A_f##, to indicate that this operator is technically not the same as ##\hat A##, but acts on the function space - rather than the space of states/kets. I.e. I would tend to write:
$$\hat A' \Psi(r) \equiv [\hat A'\Psi](r) \equiv \langle r|\hat A|\Psi \rangle$$In any case, note that this defines the action of the operator ##\hat A'## on any function ##\Psi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis and LightPhoton

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K