Where Can We Find Reliable News in Today's Media?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    News Sources
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reliability of news sources in today's media landscape, exploring concerns about journalistic integrity, the influence of entertainment on news reporting, and the challenges faced by consumers in discerning credible information. Participants express their views on various media outlets, including television news and newspapers, as well as the role of the internet in accessing news.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants criticize major news networks for prioritizing entertainment over informative journalism, citing specific examples of perceived decline in quality.
  • One participant mentions the value of reading multiple news sources to form a more accurate understanding of events, suggesting that this practice is more crucial now than ever.
  • Concerns are raised about the credibility and integrity of professional journalism, with some arguing that the filtering process that once ensured reliability is no longer effective.
  • Another participant notes that many people rely on only one or two news sources due to time constraints, which may limit their ability to form well-rounded opinions.
  • There is a shared skepticism about newspapers, with some expressing that they can serve as biased mouthpieces rather than objective sources of information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a general consensus on the decline of reliable news sources, but there is disagreement on the effectiveness of current media practices and the best strategies for obtaining trustworthy information.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the challenges of navigating a media landscape where objectivity is questioned, and the impact of personal biases on news reporting is acknowledged. The discussion reflects a variety of perspectives on the role of traditional and digital media in shaping public understanding.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
Well, last night Katie Couric may have lost me for good with her ten minute interview with Karen James - wife of the climber found dead on Mt. Hood. I think it was Turbo1 who predicted that she would turn the news into the Today show, and it looks like he may have been correct. When I saw that she has a background in hard journalism, I held out hope that she would be a serious journalist, but last night was a new low for the evening news.

And CNN is on its way over a cliff. Between Nancy Grace and this new Beck idiot, much of their programming is nothing more than tabloid fluff. And of course Fox is garbage. NBC and ABC are in flux, and at this point I am starting to wonder if there will be any credible news source soon. PBS is still pretty good, but when Jim Lehrer leaves, I fear that too will end. I don't think Gwen Ifill cuts it. Her questions are often shallow or irrelevant, so even if she tries to continue the tradition of a high quality news show, I don't think she is up to the task.

As for newspapers, I gave up on those long ago. A paper is only as good as the editor, and it seems that many editors don't know how to remain objective.

With the internet being too wild as yet to provide reliable information, how will the news be filtered so that the average person knows what to believe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The news is entertainment, not informative anymore. $$$. Personally I watch Fox News just for Sheppard Smith who I think he's a fun personality, but it's not like I learn anything. Time to go back to reading the newspapers. There are some good ones. Jack Welch would read 12 newspapers every morning.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I just hit Google news. Thousands of news sources, all very easily browsable. There's no longer any reason why a person can't read two or three or four different sources for the same news story, then decide for him/herself what really happened.

- Warren
 
What prevents chaos with no way to discern who is telling the truth? A key feature of professional journalism has been credibility and integrity. No one has ever been perfect, but the majors were usually pretty reliable. If this filtering process is gone, the reported news becomes a free-for-all.

Newspapers scare me - they can amount to nothing more than a mouthpiece for one person. Also, I was related [X brother-in-law]to an editor - scary!.
 
Last edited:
Ivan Seeking said:
What prevents chaos with no way to discern who is telling the truth? A key feature of professional journalism has been credibility and integrity. No one has ever been perfect, but the majors were usually pretty reliable. If this filtering process is gone, the reported news becomes a free-for-all.

The entire concept of "reliable news" is flawed. No reporter, editor, news floor employee, fact-finder, or anyone else is actually truly objective. The only way to really understand the news is to read multiple sources, and that has always been true. It just happens to be truer today than it ever has been before.

- Warren
 
The trouble is, most people turn to one or two sources. For example, my sister votes, but with a house full of kids, she may have thirty minutes a day at most during which to form her opinions and decide how to vote.
 

Similar threads

Where Can You Find Free Unbiased News Sources?
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
News Bush Honest & Trustworthy Until How Many Lies?
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
Undergrad Where Can I Find a Reliable Source for Electron Energy Values?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K