Where Will Our Universe End? An Unanswerable Mystery

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Emp-Naval
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a hypothetical scenario where every planet, star, asteroid, and bit of matter in the universe is equipped with thrusters to move them all in the same direction. Participants explore the implications of this scenario, questioning the nature of movement, reference frames, and the concept of the universe's boundaries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the significance of moving "every last bit of matter" and whether it changes the outcome of the scenario.
  • Others argue that if all matter were to move, it would lead to observable effects such as blueshift and redshift of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), potentially resulting in gamma radiation effects over time.
  • A participant suggests that using the CMB as a reference frame is temporary, as it may eventually disappear, leading to questions about what lies beyond the universe.
  • Concerns are raised about the conservation of momentum, noting that moving all matter in one direction would contradict this principle.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the practicality of the thought experiment, suggesting it is pointless to consider impossible scenarios.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the universe's boundaries, with differing views on whether the universe has an edge or if it is infinite.
  • A Machian perspective is introduced, stating that moving everything is equivalent to not moving at all, as only relative motions are measurable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement. While some acknowledge the implications of the thought experiment, others challenge its feasibility and relevance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of the universe's boundaries and the implications of moving all matter.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about reference frames, the nature of movement, and the implications of hypothetical scenarios, which remain unresolved throughout the discussion.

Emp-Naval
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
OK... So I was sitting there minding my own business when my alter ego popped out of no where and started asking me all these weird questions...

One in particular was interesting enough, and I couldn't even imagine what would be the result.

What if we mounted every planet, star, asteroid, and every last bit of matter with thrusters strong enough to move them. Then we simultaneously start them in the same direction (+ve X axis?), where would we end at? For the sake of discussion, let's say that the thrusters will last indefinitely.
 
Space news on Phys.org
After rethinking, this belongs to General Astronomy... If a mod could move it please, and sorry for the inconvenience.
 
What difference does doing this to "every last bit of matter" make?
 
so we could move all the matter in the universe...
 
since its impossible to do, its pretty pointless thinking about it.
 
We would end up X distance from where we were, where X is an ever increasing amount. Assuming we continue to accelerate, as you've worded your question that way, we would see the CMB blueshift in one direction and redshift in the other. Eventually the blueshift would be so high that the incoming radiation would be in the gamma ray range, and after even more time the gamma rays would be able to disintegrate matter through the photodisintegration effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photodisintegration
 
davenn said:
since its impossible to do, its pretty pointless thinking about it.

I know it's impossible, but why wouldn't you want to use your mind a little?!
 
Drakkith said:
We would end up X distance from where we were, where X is an ever increasing amount. Assuming we continue to accelerate, as you've worded your question that way, we would see the CMB blueshift in one direction and redshift in the other. Eventually the blueshift would be so high that the incoming radiation would be in the gamma ray range, and after even more time the gamma rays would be able to disintegrate matter through the photodisintegration effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photodisintegration

We will end up an X distance from what... There is nothing to be moving in respect to?
 
Emp-Naval said:
We will end up an X distance from what... There is nothing to be moving in respect to?

Sure there is. The cosmic microwave background. We could use that as a reference and devise frames of reference for each object to compare itself to.
 
  • #10
Ok, CMB might work as a "temporary" solution, but sooner or later it will just disappear, like in a trillion years from now I reckon...

Besides, If every last bit of matter moved 10 cm to the right, where would it be moving into, the matter is the universe! I think the question can be de-dramatized to the classical question, what lies behind the edge of our universe?
 
  • #11
Emp-Naval said:
What if we mounted every planet, star, asteroid, and every last bit of matter with thrusters strong enough to move them. Then we simultaneously start them in the same direction (+ve X axis?), where would we end at? For the sake of discussion, let's say that the thrusters will last indefinitely.

Thrusters work by sending matter in the opposite direction, so you can't move "every bit of matter" in the same direction without sending some of it in the opposite direction. This is momentum conservation 101.
 
  • #12
Borek said:
Thrusters work by sending matter in the opposite direction, so you can't move "every bit of matter" in the same direction without sending some of it in the opposite direction. This is momentum conservation 101.

Good point here, and I feel dumb now >.>
 
  • #13
Emp-Naval said:
Ok, CMB might work as a "temporary" solution, but sooner or later it will just disappear, like in a trillion years from now I reckon...

The CMB is only used to give ourselves an initial reference point. We could use any inertial frame and still be okay. For example, if we were to use the frame of a particle that is later annihilated, the frame of reference would still be just fine. You can think of it as putting an imaginary observer right next to the particle that continues on with whatever velocity the particle had before annihilation.

Besides, If every last bit of matter moved 10 cm to the right, where would it be moving into, the matter is the universe! I think the question can be de-dramatized to the classical question, what lies behind the edge of our universe?

The matter is not the universe, nor is there a known edge to the universe. If everything moved 10 cm to the right, it would be 10 cm to the right from its previous position.

Note that we don't literally need to constantly measure ourselves against a real object. Inertial navigation uses onboard, passive sensors that sense acceleration and direction and then uses that data to calculate a position without ever having to "look" at anything.
 
  • #14
Emp-Naval,
Are you thinking that the Universe have a boundary?Like a ball?
When I was a kid,I thought that if I go out of the Universe,I would see white colour all around.
 
  • #15
adjacent said:
When I was a kid,I thought that if I go out of the Universe,I would see white colour all around.

I always thought it would be pitch black.
 
  • #16
Emp-Naval said:
I know it's impossible, but why wouldn't you want to use your mind a little?!

cuz I have better and more practical, real world, things to think about
than to waste time on the impossible :wink:


Dave
 
  • #17
Emp-Naval said:
We will end up an X distance from what... There is nothing to be moving in respect to?

Why is that a problem?
 
  • #18
Taking the Machian point of view, if you moved everything, then it's the same as not moving at all, since only relative motions are measurable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
654
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
90
Views
12K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K