Courses Which C++ book is best for learning algorithms and data structures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shivajikobardan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algorithms C++
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on preparing for a coding career with a focus on C++ and the importance of mastering algorithms and data structures through practical exercises. The individual plans to tackle exercises from a textbook, dedicating weekends over six months to complete 20% of the exercises, emphasizing hands-on learning rather than passive reading. Additionally, they express interest in graphics programming but note the outdated nature of the DarkGDK library. They seek recommendations for modern C++ libraries similar to DarkGDK, mentioning options like SFML, Allegro, and SDL. The conversation also highlights the value of Scott Meyers' "Effective C++" series, suggesting that engaging with the material through projects and exercises is crucial for effective learning.
shivajikobardan
Messages
637
Reaction score
54
1686155537799.png

1686155619753.png

As I said earlier, I've already grasped basics of C++. Since my ultimate goal is to work in coding industry, for interviews, I need to prepare for algorithms and data structures, grind leetcode. Between C++ and Java, I choosed C++ because that was taught in our university.

I won't read the first book line by line. I will start from exercises of loops and complete 20% of all exercises. It'll take at least 6 months of weekend studies for me to get there.

Another plan is to do graphics programming. The book by Tony Gaddis is so good for me. Only problem, it uses darkgdk which is very much outdated. So, if you've any recommendations for libraries in C++ like sfml, allegro, sdl, etc, Please recommend. Recommend those which is similar to darkgdk architecture. This book will also take me 6 months of full time weekend studies to finish.

Which one will be more beneficial to my learning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
One does not learn a subject by reading a textbook. One learns a subject by working through a textbook.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
One does not learn a subject by reading a textbook. One learns a subject by working through a textbook.
that's why I've picked a book which is actually built with exercises and projects.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top