Which holds greater bias: classism or racism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bias
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the comparative biases of classism and racism, examining which holds greater influence in society. Participants consider the surmountability of social classes versus racial identity, drawing on personal experiences and societal observations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that social classes are more difficult to surmount than racial identity, citing instinctual recognition among social classes.
  • Others argue that racism represents a more profound bias, as it involves judgment based solely on skin color, which cannot be changed.
  • A participant suggests that classism may be stronger than racism, noting that adopted non-white individuals experience less racism than whites.
  • Another viewpoint highlights the relatability among individuals of different races within the same socioeconomic class, suggesting that shared experiences can transcend racial divides.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the future dynamics of classism and racism, speculating that as societal views on racism evolve, classism may become more pronounced.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether classism or racism holds greater bias, with multiple competing views remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims are based on personal anecdotes and observations, which may not represent broader statistical trends. The discussion includes references to societal changes over time and the evolving nature of biases.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Are social classes more or less surmountable than racial identity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i say social classes are harder to surmount. people of a certain class always seem to find each other. they know each other by instinct, and can easily spot fakers. take Donald Trump for instance. he's coveted "class" his whole life, but has never seemed to attain it because he equates it with money. sure, he's good at making money, but has he ever really crossed that cultural barrier he aspires to? i don't think so. it's not who he is.
 
I would imagine racism. How much more bias can you be than to dislike or look down upon a person for no reason other than the colour of their skin?

Unless there is an incredibly large gap between persons the ability to identify one as being of a lower or upper class is mostly wishful thinking. I've met a millionaire that dressed in jeans, flannels, and cowboy boots. He drove a sensible pickup truck and you could often see him whittling outside of the coffee house I worked at. Rarely ever talked about money or let on that he might be any more than comfortably retired on a pension. I've also met people that were poor primarily because they spent all of their money on having a nice car and nice clothes and such. People working for not much more than minimum wage that drove around in a Lexus with nice clothes, a gold watch, and wearing expensive cologne.
 
I would say that racism is a much greater hurdle.

If someone judges you on the color of your skin or the slant of your eyes, nothing you can do can change that.

If it's just a matter of getting in with snobs, you can learn how to fool them. The old rich doesn't mean much anymore in western countries. Money gets you accepted now. There isn't as much snobbery around "nouveau riche" now as in the past. Celebrity rich and flash in the pan rich is all you need in greedy circles now. No one knows what having "class" or "etiquette" is anymore. It's all been thrown out the window.
 
Classism is much stronger than racism though. An adopted non white gets almost as little "racism" as whites.
 
Klockan3 said:
Classism is much stronger than racism though. An adopted non white gets almost as little "racism" as whites.

Any statistics? I tried to look but adoption statistics pages are difficult to wade through and usually not very specific.

I did find though that apparently the system itself is racist when it comes to interracial adoption.
http://academic.udayton.edu/race/04needs/adopt03.htm
 
It doesn't matter with which wall we bang our head... finally it hurts
 
Considering I make below the poverty line, I have much more in common with other races that are in my own class than I do with people of my own race in the middle class or upper class. My 2 best friends(one I went to Iraq with and the other who was military with a combat background) are of another race but all can tell relate to similar previous experiences. I would say classism. Though I would love to see a study on this.
 
Loren Booda said:
Are social classes more or less surmountable than racial identity?

I would say that racism is stronger than classism, at least today. But racism is quickly becoming unfashionable,* while classism is roughly as popular now as ever (at least in my view). So perhaps after a few generations, as not-openly-racist generations give way to largely-not-racist generations, classism will become more of a problem. I would view that as a success of great magnitude.

* N.B., _not_ the same as disappearing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K