MHB Which Person (if any) has a greater chance of picking out the Red ball?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pwange
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
Person A has a greater chance of picking the Red ball compared to Person B due to having two attempts. The probability for Person A is calculated as 2/5, while Person B's probability is 1/4. This demonstrates that having two attempts increases the likelihood of success. The calculations confirm that Person A's probability of drawing the Red ball is indeed higher than Person B's. Therefore, Person A is more likely to successfully pick the Red ball.
pwange
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A)
There are 5 balls inside bag A. They're all a different color (Red, Blue, Green, Orange, Purple).

Person A has two attempts to pick a Red ball from inside bag A:

1st Attempt: 1/5 chance = 20% = Let's say Person A picked out a blue ball.

2nd Attempt: 1/4 chance = 25%.

B)
There are 4 balls inside bag B. They're all a different color (Red, Green, Orange, Purple).

Person B have one attempt to pick a Red ball from inside bag B:

1st Attempt: 1/4 chance = 25%.

Question:
Which Person (if any) has a greater chance of picking out a Red ball?

My Answer:
Person A has a higher chance, because they get two attempts. Although I have no clue how to prove that.
Nor do I know by how much.

The answer might be equal (25% on both), but that doesn't make much sense to me.
I'd rather have two attempts than one.

Help please...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For person A, we can approach this directly:

We look at the case where red was drawn first, OR red was not drawn first but is drawn second.

$$P(\text{Red})=P(\text{First draw red})+P(\text{First not red AND second red})$$

$$P(\text{Red})=\frac{1}{5}+\frac{4}{5}\cdot\frac{1}{4}=\frac{2}{5}$$

We can also use the complement rule:

We know it is certain the person A will draw red in the first two draws, OR will not draw red in the first two draws:

$$P(\text{Red})+P(\text{Not red})=1$$

$$P(\text{Red})=1-P(\text{Not red})$$

$$P(\text{Red})=1-\frac{4}{5}\cdot\frac{3}{4}=1-\frac{3}{5}=\frac{2}{5}$$

So, we see for person A we have:

$$P_A(\text{Red})=\frac{2}{5}$$

And it is easy to see that for person B we have:

$$P_B(\text{Red})=\frac{1}{4}$$

Now, we know:

$$8>5$$

Divide through by 20:

$$\frac{2}{5}>\frac{1}{4}$$

Hence:

$$P_A(\text{Red})>P_B(\text{Red})$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top