Which Specialisation Should I Choose: Theoretical Physics or Theoretical CS?

  • Context: Testing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shirley.C
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dilemma of choosing between Theoretical Physics and Theoretical Computer Science (CS) as a specialization in undergraduate studies. Participants explore the perceived difficulty of each field, their personal interests, and potential career implications, while considering the impact on GPA and future academic pursuits.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about which specialization is harder, Physics or Theoretical CS, and seeks general advice on which might be a "GPA-killer."
  • Another participant suggests looking up syllabi or consulting with peers who have taken the courses to gauge workload differences.
  • A participant notes that Theoretical CS seems to relate to Abstract Algebra, but struggles to compare its difficulty with Physics.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of interest in both fields, with a focus on the potential for internships in Theoretical CS versus the enjoyment of solving applied math problems in Physics.
  • Some participants argue that pursuing a field one enjoys, such as Applied Math, may lead to better academic performance regardless of difficulty.
  • Employment opportunities in CS are mentioned as a potential advantage over Physics.
  • Another participant emphasizes that if one loves Applied Math and has no interest in CS, Physics may be the better choice.
  • One participant reflects on their own experience, suggesting that passion for a subject can lead to better grades, regardless of the specialization's perceived difficulty.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the difficulty of each specialization and the importance of personal interest in making a decision. There is no consensus on which field is definitively harder or more beneficial, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best choice for the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that difficulty can vary based on individual strengths and interests, and that external factors such as career goals and internship opportunities may influence the decision. There is also mention of the potential for taking additional programming courses alongside either specialization.

Shirley.C
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi friends, I am a new member here. I have a bit of a dilemma here, so I thought it would be best to ask your advice on this. Thanks in advance for all your inputs.

So, the problem is I have to pick one specialisation area in my UG, either Theoretical Physics or Theoretical CS. I am really confused between the two. I am a math major and I can confidently say that I am fairly good at it. I have taken courses in Abstract Algebra, Analysis, Topology, Probability & ODE.

The problem is, I am neither interested in CS nor Physics. I am planning to take graduate level Math & Stat courses, so, I would like to know which is harder - Physics or Theoretical CS?

Although I don't like Physics to the point that I want to do PhD in it, I do like Applied Math. Some say that Theoretical CS is Applied Math, but, all I see is recreational math problems that I encountered in Olympiad. Moreover, I would chooce Theoretical CS ONLY IF it is significantly easier than Physics, otherwise I would go with Physics - if they both require same level of work.

P.S: Don't get pissed off with my question, I am well aware that these things vary, but, please give me a general advice on which is a GPA-killer!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?

To paraphrase: Generally speaking, which is the GPA-killer - Physics or Theoretical CS (Automata Theory, Algorithms, Theoretical Concepts of Progrmming Languages)?
 
Why don't you look up the syllabus for each class, or ask others who have taken the class, to try to determine the workload?
 
I have no idea about Theoretical CS, but, a quick glance at it made me realize that it's sort of Abstract Algebra (not contextually, but, in the abstract sense), so I kinda understand how difficult it is, but, I'm clueless when I compare it with Physics, hence I'm here.

There are other points to consider, for instance if I choose TCS I can go for internship whereas for Physics I can't. But, it's really difficult for me to choose. I would appreciate if someone shed some light on this, anything at all would be great!
 
The more information/context you give us, the better we may be able to help. You could give separate arguments for/against each choice.
 
I apologise for that!

Well I have come up with some points here...

THEORETICAL CS

Pros -
1. I can possibly attend one or two internships (one research based).
2. I heard people say that TCS will improve ones ability with proofs (but, I am quite confident about my skills with proofs, since I am a pure math major).

Con - I am just not interested in this at all, not a bit. (NOTE: But, I don't want to rule this out because of this, if it is considerably easier than Physics, I would by all means take it).

PHYSICS

Pros - I am not interested in doing a PhD in Physics, BUT I LOVE Applied Math.
Con - There are no other benefits of learning physics for me other than that I will be enjoying solving applied-math problems and developing the *common sense*.

CONCERNS -
1. How difficult is it as compared to TCS GPA wise?
2. Also, I am planning to take PhD level Math & Statistics courses, so, I also would like to know if it's manageable to do this alongside with Physics courses or it'd be easier to take the PhD courses alongside with TCS courses?
3. How easy (or difficult) Physics courses are to someone who is not passionate about *Learning the concepts deeply*. Most of the senior students at my place are highly passionate about physics graduate school, so, their advice doesn't suit me well.

NOTE: Even if i take Physics specialisation I would still be taking 2 - 3 programming courses.
 
What I did in my undergrad specialization, was to pick what I liked the most. This happened to be the most difficult specialization in my faculty, but because I liked it I got very good grades in most of its courses, so I wouldn't really worry about your GPA. Given that you put "I LOVE APPLIED MATH" in one of the pros, I think you have chosen already :smile:

One think you might want to consider apart from this, is that CS might generally give you better employment opportunities than physics.
 
If you love applied math and have no interested at all in computer science, then you should do physics.
 
Shirley.C said:
Hi friends, I am a new member here. I have a bit of a dilemma here, so I thought it would be best to ask your advice on this. Thanks in advance for all your inputs.

So, the problem is I have to pick one specialisation area in my UG, either Theoretical Physics or Theoretical CS. I am really confused between the two. I am a math major and I can confidently say that I am fairly good at it. I have taken courses in Abstract Algebra, Analysis, Topology, Probability & ODE.

The problem is, I am neither interested in CS nor Physics. I am planning to take graduate level Math & Stat courses, so, I would like to know which is harder - Physics or Theoretical CS?

Although I don't like Physics to the point that I want to do PhD in it, I do like Applied Math. Some say that Theoretical CS is Applied Math, but, all I see is recreational math problems that I encountered in Olympiad. Moreover, I would chooce Theoretical CS ONLY IF it is significantly easier than Physics, otherwise I would go with Physics - if they both require same level of work.

P.S: Don't get pissed off with my question, I am well aware that these things vary, but, please give me a general advice on which is a GPA-killer!

Assuming you’re as good at math as I understand you to state, I doubt either path will kill your GPA. What do you want to do after college and graduate school with your degrees? Have you researched careers? The degree is a parchment symbolizing your educational achievement, but it's only a step in a very long life of work. I would look at what I wanted to do for the rest of my life, and figure out which route will best get me there.
 
  • #10
Thanks micromass, meldraft and thinktoday(i like ur screen name). I think I will go with Physics finally. Thanks a lot again!
 

Similar threads

Course advice for Theoretical Physics at Cambridge University
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Courses Need help in choosing math classes for a HS student
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Programs Area to choose for my Master's thesis: theoretical physics/mathematical physics?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Programs Advice for majoring in theoretical physics
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Schools Theoretical Physics Masters Course in Spain or Italy?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Other Need advice regarding choosing my master's research project in theoretical physics and applied maths
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Programs From CS bachelor graduate to new physics bachelor?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Should I skip labs/experiments for Mathematical Physics program?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Any tips for doing a PhD in theoretical physics?
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Can one do mathematical physics and theoretical physics at the same time?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K