White deer couple producing viable offspring through several generations?

  • Thread starter Newai
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Couple
In summary: Alright.In summary, a white deer couple from the 1950s rapidly multiplied and produced the world's largest population of white deer. How is that possible? They are under human protection and their very low diversity will only be a problem if their gene pool contains deleterious alleles. But it's a single couple so their population is likely to be protected in unchanging environment. Far more dangerous would be the increased likelihood of inheriting fatal autosomal recessive diseases.
  • #1
Newai
32
1
According to this video, a white deer couple from the 1950s rapidly multiplied and produced the world's largest population of white deer. How is that possible?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_TvkB1-XeE
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well IIRC deer reach sexual maturity after 1.5-2.5 years, so in the 60 years since they've been there that's plenty of time to multiply. Especially considering they are pretty protected where they are.
 
  • #3
ryan_m_b said:
Well IIRC deer reach sexual maturity after 1.5-2.5 years, so in the 60 years since they've been there that's plenty of time to multiply. Especially considering they are pretty protected where they are.

But it's a single couple. How could they maintain genetic diversity, keep their gene pool safe?
 
  • #4
Newai said:
But it's a single couple. How could they maintain genetic diversity, keep their gene pool safe?

Their very low diversity will only be a problem if their gene pool contains deleterious alleles. Considering deleterious alleles are mostly contextual on the environment it will make their population very sensitive to change.
 
  • #5
Newai said:
But it's a single couple. How could they maintain genetic diversity, keep their gene pool safe?

Inbreeding would definitely create issues. However since they are a conserved species, the absence of enough genetic diversity would not be such a big problem, as they are likely to be protected in unchanging environment. Far more dangerous would be the increased likelihood of inheriting fatal autosomal recessive diseases. However since this also has a 50% chance of affecting the newer generation, things probably turned out to be good for the couple. After many generations, even inbreeding wouldn't pose a huge problem.
 
  • #6
I'm really surprised by all of that. I never thought this could be possible.

Thank you, guys.
 
  • #7
Newai said:
I'm really surprised by all of that. I never thought this could be possible.

Thank you, guys.

I am surprised how a single couple could lead to a viable fertile population as well. I have heard of island colonizations from a few hundred turning into a few million. But this is strange.
 
  • #8
mishrashubham said:
I am surprised how a single couple could lead to a viable fertile population as well. I have heard of island colonizations from a few hundred turning into a few million. But this is strange.

It doesn't entirely surprise me if only because rare events happen all the time in nature. The dangerous aspect now is what happens if their environment changes, their diversity may be too low to cope.
 
  • #9
ryan_m_b said:
The dangerous aspect now is what happens if their environment changes, their diversity may be too low to cope.

They are under human protection I suppose.
 
  • #10
Be aware that just because they are surviving now in no way means that they will survive in the future. Fifty years is an incredibly short timescale for a population of a species. Just because they are able to reproduce successfully doesn't mean they are "viable". It is possible that the lack of diversity could result in a number of weaknesses that haven't shown themselves yet, such as a succeptibility to a disease that a larger more diverse population would be mostly resistant to. Inbreeding doesn't mean that it is impossible to produce a future population. If the species is able to survive long enough then many of the negative genes could be weeded out as the individuals that receive them die off while the ones that don't live on. It really just depends on the indivuduals that first breed and the traits they pass on.
 
  • #11
Drakkith said:
Fifty years is an incredibly short timescale for a population of a species. Just because they are able to reproduce successfully doesn't mean they are "viable".

Viable offspring in this context implies healthy newborns who go on to become mature and fertile adults.
 
  • #12
mishrashubham said:
Viable offspring in this context implies healthy newborns who go on to become mature and fertile adults.

Alright.
 
  • #13
Who said it was a one couple only? Perhaps I missed something, but what they said in the video is that there was one white couple. It doesn't mean there were no other animals. Besides, at around 10 sec there is an obviously dark calf (is it a proper name for a young deer?) visible. It can be heterozygous, increasing the chance that its offspring will be white as well. So the way I understand the story the population in the depot has an unusually large percentage of white animals, but it is not all necessarily progeny of the same couple.
 

1. How common are white deer?

White deer are considered rare and make up only a small percentage of the overall deer population.

2. Why are white deer white?

White deer are white due to a genetic condition called leucism, which causes a reduction in pigmentation. This condition is different from albinism, which results in a complete lack of pigmentation.

3. Can white deer only produce white offspring?

No, white deer can produce both white and brown offspring. The white coloration is a recessive trait, so both parents must carry the gene for their offspring to be white.

4. How many generations can white deer remain white?

White deer can remain white for multiple generations, as long as both parents carry the gene for the white coloration. However, over time, the chances of a white deer mating with another white deer becomes less likely, so the prevalence of white deer may decrease.

5. Are white deer more susceptible to predators?

White deer may be more visible to predators due to their lack of camouflage, but there is no evidence to suggest that they are more susceptible to predation compared to brown deer. In fact, some studies have shown that white deer may have a survival advantage in certain environments.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
7
Replies
236
Views
12K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
891
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
650
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
3
Replies
77
Views
7K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
3
Replies
96
Views
5K
Back
Top