Who has the advantage in Risk: Attacker or Defender?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adrianopolis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game
adrianopolis
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In risk, the attacking party rolls 3 die and the top two numbers of the 3 die rolled get put up against 2 die rolled by the defender. If the die are equal then the defender wins. For example if the offender rolls 5 5 2 and the defender rolls 4 3, then 2 defender men die. If the offender rolls 5 5 2 and the defender rolls 5 4 then they trade kills because when die are equal the defender wins.
If offender rolls 5 5 2 and the defender rolls 6 6 the defender wins. Who has the advantage? Attacking or defending? What is the comparative advantage?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with die in the singular and dice in the plural.
 
Here's one way to approach it.
Break it into four cases from defender's perspective:
++ win on both
+- win on high dice, lose on low
-+ etc.
--

Case ++:
For each defender roll, count attacker possibilities:
6+6: 63
6+5: 53+3.1.52 (attacker rolls no 6s or one 6)
6+4: 43+3.2.42 (attacker rolls no 5s nor 6s, or just one such)
:
6+1: 13+3.5.12 (attacker rolls nothing above 1 or just one such)
(remember to count all above except 6+6 twice)
5+5: 53
etc.
Summing, we get sum for r = 1 to 6 for each of:
r3, 2r3(6-r), 6r2(6-r) = -2r4+7r3+36r2
Sum the series to r and plug in r=6.

Similarly, for case +-:
6+5: 13+3.12.5
6+4: 23+3.22.4
etc.
 
haruspex said:
Here's one way to approach it.
Break it into four cases from defender's perspective:
++ win on both
+- win on high dice, lose on low
-+ etc.
--

Case ++:
For each defender roll, count attacker possibilities:
6+6: 63
6+5: 53+3.1.52 (attacker rolls no 6s or one 6)
6+4: 43+3.2.42 (attacker rolls no 5s nor 6s, or just one such)
:
6+1: 13+3.5.12 (attacker rolls nothing above 1 or just one such)
(remember to count all above except 6+6 twice)
5+5: 53
etc.
Summing, we get sum for r = 1 to 6 for each of:
r3, 2r3(6-r), 6r2(6-r) = -2r4+7r3+36r2
Sum the series to r and plug in r=6.

Similarly, for case +-:
6+5: 13+3.12.5
6+4: 23+3.22.4
etc.

Thanks man. I'm a little confused by what for example 3.1.5^2 means but thanks for the help
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top