Who is the greatest physicist in history?

  • Context: History 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Izzhov
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread explores the question of who is considered the greatest physicist in history, inviting participants to vote for their choice based on the significance of the physicist's contributions to the field. The discussion includes humorous and ironic responses, as well as a playful approach to the voting process.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a voting method where any physicist can be nominated, emphasizing the importance of their contributions.
  • Another participant quotes Isaac Newton, expressing a philosophical view on the influence of past scientists without casting a vote.
  • Several participants humorously nominate unconventional figures, such as Homer Simpson and abstract concepts, rather than established physicists.
  • A participant proposes new criteria for voting, insisting that nominees must be actual people and their contributions must be identified.
  • There is a playful exchange about the nature of the votes, with some participants jokingly voting for non-physicists or ironic choices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on who the greatest physicist is, with multiple competing views and humorous nominations remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion is characterized by a lack of serious nominations for established physicists, with many contributions leaning towards humor and irony rather than substantive debate on contributions to physics.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in a light-hearted take on the history of physics and the contributions of notable figures in the field may find this discussion engaging.

Izzhov
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
Alright, alright, I have an idea. Instead of using the regular poll, you can vote for anyone you want, and I will add it to this post by editing it. That way, you can vote for whoever you want, with no limit to the options. Just post the name of who you're voting for after this post. All votes before this post will be discredited, so if you already voted, you need to vote again.
Here's the criteria:
-The physicist's contribution to physics must have been, in your opinion, the most important and the one which another person would have been least likely to discover had the physicist never existed.
The Current Vote Status:
(no one so far)
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
'If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants.'

The above quote by Isaac Newton pretty much encompass my views on it. To clarify, I am not voting for anyone.
 
Vote for me.

*votes for himself*
 
You really did note get the point...

I vote for the guy who invented the wheel.

No ! For the guy who first made fire.

Errr... No ! For the fish that made it out of water !

Ok, I vote for myself too :-p
 
*plays creepy music*

I vote for the poll itself.
 
Moridin said:
The above quote by Isaac Newton pretty much encompass my views on it. To clarify, I am not voting for anyone.

I vote for Newton's shoulders. Say, that was meant as a flip remark, but it's actually quite deep. Yes, Newton's shoulders. :approve:
 
I'm taking off all of the votes so far and adding 2 new criteria:
a) The person you're voting for must be a person, and
b) You must identify their contribution to physics.
 
Izzhov said:
I'm taking off all of the votes so far and adding 2 new criteria:
a) The person you're voting for must be a person, and
b) You must identify their contribution to physics.

You seriously still don't get the point?

I vote for Homer Simpson for discovering the flying rock. His quick action lead to numerous collaborations between geologist and physicist to explain the phenomenon.
 
Okay, you win.
 
  • #10
ranger said:
I vote for Homer Simpson for discovering the flying rock. His quick action lead to numerous collaborations between geologist and physicist to explain the phenomenon.
:smile:
Since my vote was cancelled, and you are obviously much more knowledgeable than I am, I vote fore for you :approve:

*votes for ranger*
 
  • #11
I vote for an ironic and unexpected noun in place of an actual physicist.
 
  • #12
Chi Meson said:
I vote for an ironic and unexpected noun in place of an actual physicist.

Yes, that seems to be the pattern... :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K