Who were the earliest known makers of the violin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icebreaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Holes Sound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationship between integrals and the sound holes of violins, touching on historical aspects of violin making and the origins of the integral sign. Participants delve into the aesthetics of violin design, mathematical symbolism, and the evolution of musical instruments, with a focus on theoretical and conceptual connections.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the shape of the violin's F-holes resembles an integral sign, prompting speculation about a historical connection.
  • One participant recalls reading that a violin maker was inspired by calculus, although they cannot find the source to confirm this claim.
  • Another participant notes that the cover of a calculus textbook features a violin, leading them to consider a connection between mathematics and music.
  • A participant mentions that the F-hole shapes predate the integral sign, questioning the validity of linking the two.
  • Dr. George Bissinger states that the origins of F-hole shapes are not well-documented and that modern makers often alter these shapes, which can affect sound.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the term "vapor state pursuit," with interpretations suggesting it refers to the elusive nature of tracing the origins of the F-holes or the integral sign.
  • There is discussion about the historical evolution of the violin and its makers, with references to the Amati family as significant figures in early violin making.
  • Participants debate the etymology of the term "summa" and its relation to the integral sign, with some asserting it is Latin while others reference Greek origins.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between integrals and violin sound holes, with multiple competing views and ongoing uncertainty about the historical connections discussed.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of definitive historical sources regarding the origins of F-hole shapes and the integral sign, as well as the ambiguity surrounding the term "vapor state pursuit." The discussion reflects a mix of speculation and personal interpretations without clear resolutions.

Icebreaker
Does anyone know the relation between integrals and the sound holes on the violin?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Icebreaker said:
Does anyone know the relation between integrals and the sound holes on the violin?

What, the way that the F-holes look like an integral sign?
 
Yes. I read somewhere that they were incorporated onto the violin after some violin maker was impressed with calculus. But I can't find the source.
 
james stewart's calculus text has a violin or something on the cover. seeing that cover for the first time was the first time i noticed that. it made me think that math is 'musical' in some (superficial) way, the way it looks on the page or something like that.

edit: on second thought I'm not sure that i believe that. euler was the first to use a stretched-out latin summa for an integral sign (i think) but he was around after the old-school baroque violins were made & they had the same soundholes as later ones. i think that's all true but i may be wrong. if i am wrong i'll of course look like a total bull****ter lol.
 
Last edited:
I should think Mentor Integral would know the history of the symbol, when it first came to be used.
 
Icebreaker said:
Does anyone know the relation between integrals and the sound holes on the violin?
I have seen papers on vibration analysis of violins in which they discuss the formation of chladni pattern formations at various resonant frequencies. From what I remember, the sound holes seemed to always be enveloped by the nodal lines. They didn't seem to cross them. I am not sure if that is coincidence or not. But by the looks of it, the general envelope of where to put the holes is somewhat driven by the tuning of the top and the "integral" shape came from stylization that was popular in the day. I will have to keep digging on this one. Interesting question.

EDIT: Aquick Google came up with this link:
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/chladni.html

It doesn't exactly reference a direct expalination, but I think it's a start. I'll have to read the whole thing later.
 
Last edited:
If Euler was the first to use the stretched out S, then it was probably the other way around, that Euler used the shape of the violin sound holes. Then again, it could be a coincidence.
 
I've sent a email to this gentleman. I bet he knows the answer, hope he's not on summer break
http://www.ecu.edu/physics/George.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My professional bass guitarist roommate isn't sure but thinks its stylized based on a treble clef symbol. We think the area of the hole probably matters because it needs to let a certain amount of air move in and out, but other than that the geometry shouldn't matter.
 
  • #10
from: Dr. George Bissinger
Professor of Physics
East Carolina University
Howell Science Complex

Hypatia,

I wish I could enlighten you and your folks about this but no one really
knows many details about the origin/originator during the 1500-early
1600 period of many of the things we accept as commonplace today. This
includes f-hole shapes, which are quite variable and certainly not
always f-shaped. In fact modern makers often change proportions to suit
their personal whims - and in some cases this significantly affects the
sound. So seeing integral signs prior to actual integrals is probably a
vapor state pursuit.

George

Thank you for answering George.
 
  • #11
That's a nice letter.

What, though, does he mean by a "vapor state pursuit"?
 
  • #12
The f-hole shapes were made befor the integral, so the pursuit of this is not realistic?

lol Now I wonder if the person who made the integral sign, got it from the violin?

It is a very eye pleaseing shape
 
  • #13
hypatia said:
The f-hole shapes were made befor the integral, so the pursuit of this is not realistic?
It sounds like a physics term he is using to indicate that there may not be any single actual origin, no one violin or violin maker you could point to and say "Here we have the first, classic violin sound holes."
That's my impression, but I need to know if there is actually such an endeavor in physics as a "vapor state pursuit" and what the attendent difficulties are, to be sure I'm understanding him.
lol Now I wonder if the person who made the integral sign, got it from the violin?
Fourier jr said it's the greek symbol summa, stretched out:
fourier jr said:
euler was the first to use a stretched-out latin summa for an integral sign (i think)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
zoobyshoe said:
Fourier jr said it's the greek symbol summa, stretched out:

I'm pretty sure summa is latin. Summa, which means "sum," was written with a stretched "s" (the integral sign)
\smallint \text{VMMA} (perhaps something like this?)
while the modern day "s" was used as a terminal "s" (that is, used when the "s" sound ended a syllable). The greeks have something similar: sigma \sigma and terminal sigma \varsigma.
 
  • #15
well I asked up in the physics threads..maybe someone will help us with "vapor state pursuit".
 
  • #16
Sounds like he's saying: trying to relate the f holes to the integral sign is wrong since the holes existed before the sign... Its a fruitless endeavor or a vapor state pursuit. In other words a waste of time.

Another thought may be that since the f-holes were created so long ago that the original reason it was selected has since been lost or changed. Much in the way and story is changed over time after being told many times by many people. Hence the information is in a vapor state.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
thanks for the imput :smile:
 
  • #18
Jelfish said:
I'm pretty sure summa is latin.
"...but, for mine own part, it was greek to me."

Casca in Julius Caesar
Act I, Scene II
by William Shakespeare
 
  • #19
Jelfish said:
I'm pretty sure summa is latin. Summa, which means "sum," was written with a stretched "s" (the integral sign)
\smallint \text{VMMA} (perhaps something like this?)
while the modern day "s" was used as a terminal "s" (that is, used when the "s" sound ended a syllable). The greeks have something similar: sigma \sigma and terminal sigma \varsigma.
Looks like you're more or less right about all this:

Integral Sign -- From MathWorld
Address:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IntegralSign.html
The stretched out S to mean "summation" is due to Leibnitz.
 
  • #20
Musical Instrument Q & A: Violin
Address:http://www.oriscus.com/mi/qa/violin.asp

Origins of the violin
Q:I am a violinist and I am interested to know about the history of violin: who was the inventor of the first violin (I suppose the first maker of the violin is unknown.). My sister is a flutist. She is 12 and she is researching about the same thing - the history of violin - for her school. She goes to a French school and therefore she needs this information in French. She tried hard to find the information but she didn't succeed.* Quebec* 1/20/2004
A: This is a complex question that depends on what you define as a true violin. As you suspect, the violin was not so much invented as evolved from precursors. It is widely accepted that the concept of bowed instruments began in the Middle East around 1000 AD. The essential shape we know as a "modern" violin became standard in Italy around 1550, but may have evolved as early as the previous century. At the time there were many variations on bowed instruments (largely classified by whether they were played on the shoulder or on the lrgs - viola da bracchio or viola da gamba), but the violin family eventually took prominence. Among the earliest "great" violin makers beginning from around 1540 were the Amati family: Andrea Amati, his brother Nicolo, and Adrea's sons and grandsons.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K