Whoops Navy drone strays from program

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a recent incident involving a Navy drone that strayed from its programmed flight path, prompting the Navy to ground its fleet for safety assessments. Participants reflect on the Navy's cautious operational approach and share anecdotes about past experiences with remote-controlled devices, highlighting the challenges of maintaining control over unmanned systems. The conversation underscores the importance of rigorous testing and operational protocols in drone technology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations
  • Familiarity with military operational protocols
  • Knowledge of remote control technology
  • Awareness of historical military drone incidents
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in drone safety protocols
  • Explore the history of military UAVs and their operational challenges
  • Learn about the latest developments in remote control technology for unmanned systems
  • Investigate the implications of autonomous systems in military operations
USEFUL FOR

Military personnel, drone technology enthusiasts, defense analysts, and anyone interested in the operational challenges of unmanned systems in military contexts.

mugaliens
Messages
197
Reaction score
1
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100826/tc_yblog_upshot/renegade-unmanned-drone-wandered-skies-near-nations-capital"

I'm glad the grounded the "fleet" until they figure out what happened. If anything, the Navy is usually fairly conservative with respect to their ops. I am all for drones, though, and hope they continue their advancement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I for one welcome our new skynet overlords.

Or maybe it's like Eagle Eye and all we need is the (spoiler alert!)
twin brother to finish the job
 
LOL, reminds me of a sea story.

I was aboard the USS JFK in the early '70's when they brought aboard 2 remote controlled power boats. they were between 15 - 20 ft long each powered by a massive v8 engine. The idea was to use them as bombing targets which would be too small and moving to fast for the planes to actually hit. They put the first one in the water, powered it up, it took off never to be seen again. It was out of control range before they ever got control of it. They managed to get control of the 2nd one but much to their dismay a plane manged to but a small dummy bomb right through it. The ship came along side of it, all we could see was about 3ft of bow sticking out of the water, divers dropped into the water and tied a line to the exposed tie downs. The ships crane attempted to lift it only to have the tie downs tear loose. The were designed to lift the boat, not the boat full of water! After the divers failed to get a net under it they gave up and called out the Marines who opened with rifle fire. We watched as it disappeared under the waves.

So I would say the Navy has some long term experience in loosing control of remote devices!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K