Why Are Lost Aircraft Difficult to Track Despite Satellite Technology?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rajeshmarndi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of tracking lost aircraft, particularly in the context of satellite technology and emergency location systems. Participants explore the limitations of current tracking methods, the role of satellite communication, and the functionality of emergency locator transmitters (ELTs) in crash scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why aircraft cannot be tracked continuously via satellite, suggesting that knowing the last known position should suffice for locating lost aircraft.
  • Others clarify that while aircraft send position data intermittently, they do not provide continuous tracking, leading to uncertainties about their trajectory before losing contact.
  • One participant raises the issue of potential maneuvers by the pilot or deviations caused by environmental factors, contributing to the uncertainty of the aircraft's final location.
  • Concerns are expressed about the reliability of satellite devices, particularly regarding their failure before impact and the implications for tracking.
  • Some participants inquire about the functionality of ELTs, questioning why they do not communicate directly with satellites and suggesting improvements to their design.
  • It is noted that while crash sites can be located, the challenge lies in finding debris that has sunk, indicating limitations in current tracking systems.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the distinction between ACARS and ELTs, emphasizing that ACARS is primarily for operational communication and not designed for crash scenarios.
  • Participants discuss the limitations of tracking systems when wreckage is submerged beyond certain depths, highlighting the reliance on black box pings for location identification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness of current tracking technologies and the role of ELTs. There is no consensus on the adequacy of existing systems or the potential for improvements, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on intermittent communication systems, the impact of environmental factors on aircraft trajectory, and the challenges of locating wreckage at significant depths.

rajeshmarndi
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
doesn't the aircraft leave its track through satellite?
i mean why they are unable to locate aircraft lost in sea like airfrace flight 447

if the whole track of an aircraft is known, wouldn't the exact position where it lost contact with the satellite be known then and no need of an ELT, would have been just an additional item.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rajeshmarndi said:
doesn't the aircraft leave its track through satellite?
No, it occasionally sends text messages home which also include it's position but not continuously.

if the whole track of an aircraft is known, wouldn't the exact position where it lost contact with the satellite be known then and no need of an ELT, would have been just an additional item.
Even if it did send a message continuosuly you would know the last position when the system still worked - with the aircraft at 30-40,000 ft. A plane can move a long way falling from that height, then once it hits the water the debris can be spread over a large area as it falls another 10,000ft to the bottom of the ocean.
 
Hi there,

From what I know, the satellite lost connection to the aircraft, before the crash. Therefore, the aircraft continued a trajectory before hitting the water surface.

The problem comes from the fact that the trajectory of the aircraft between the two moments is unknown. Did the pilot tried to manoeuvre to come back to its starting point? Was the aircraft deviated from its original trajectory due to wind or other reasons? There are many more parameters that might have happened before the crash. Therefore, leaving a lot of uncertainties on the exact location.

Cheers
 
mgb_phys said:
Even if it did send a message continuosuly you would know the last position when the system still worked - with the aircraft at 30-40,000 ft. A plane can move a long way falling from that height, then once it hits the water the debris can be spread over a large area as it falls another 10,000ft to the bottom of the ocean.

why would the satellite device fail in the air unless its an air collision as it would be sending signal irrespective of aircraft still working. It is understandable device failing on impact with water surface. So in that case it wouldn't be 30-40,000 ft, it would loose contact may be on impact with the water surface.
 
and also couldn't the ELT instead of searching its signal , be able to communicate with the satellite
 
Note that they DID find the crash site so the existing tracking systems are perfectly adequate. The problem is locating the pieces of the debris that sank.
 
i want to know does the ELT send signal to satellite, as far as i know the signal are only able to be traced by search and rescue having a receiver for that frequency and if yes why doesn't the ELT couldn't be designed to send signal to satellite
 
There are several things here that you might be confusing.

ACARS is a data link between the aircraft and the airline's HQ - it sends simple text messages , these include the current position (from the aircraft's GPS) and are sent over a commercial communications satelite network (eg. orbcom).
These messages are mostly to alert the airline of any delays and technical faults they aren't intended for crashes - They are powered from the aircraft so don't work once the aircraft has failed. These are the messages the news media mentioned in the recent Air France crash.

The emergency location tranceiver (ELT) sends a signal to a special cluster of satelites used just for land and sea emergencies - it includes the location from it's own built in GPS and has built in batteries. It is triggered on impact or manually in an emergency. In practice many of these don't survive the impact of a crash.

Neither of these systems work when the wreckage is under 3000m of water. So on the black box is a speaker which sends out pings that a microphone on a boat or submarine can use to zero in it's location. This is a bit hit or miss because the wreckage has no way of knowing it's location so can't send a message to anyone.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
779
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K