Why Are the Peaks at Δ = 0 and Δ = ω_m Equally High?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interaction picture optomechanical Hamiltonian given by $$H = -\Delta a^{\dagger}a + \omega_m b^{\dagger}b + g_0 * a^{\dagger}a (b + b^{\dagger})$$, which describes a cavity with a movable end mirror. The user analyzes the steady-state solution for average photon number ##n_C## and average phonon number ##n_M## as a function of detuning, revealing peaks at ##\Delta = 0## and ##\Delta = \omega_m##. The user seeks to understand why both peaks exhibit equal heights despite differing average photon counts, attributing this to the effective coupling strength being equal at both detunings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically optomechanics.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonians and their applications in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of QUTIP for simulating quantum systems.
  • Concept of resonance in photon-phonon interactions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation and applications of the optomechanical Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the Lorentzian resonance curve and its significance in quantum optics.
  • Investigate the role of effective coupling strength in optomechanical systems.
  • Study the impact of detuning on photon and phonon interactions in cavity systems.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in quantum mechanics, particularly those focused on optomechanical systems, as well as physicists interested in photon-phonon interactions and cavity quantum electrodynamics.

LionCereals
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How can I explain the average occupation numbers of a coupled cavity-mirror system?
I am considering the following Hamiltonian:
$$H = -\Delta a^{\dagger}a + \omega_m b^{\dagger}b + g_0 * a^{\dagger}a (b + b^{\dagger})$$
which is the interaction picture optomechanical Hamiltonian for a cavity with movable end mirror. The mirror vibrations are quantized, leading to phonons that are annihilated / created using ##b, b^{\dagger}##. Photons in one cavity mode are created with ##a^{\dagger}##.

I have plotted the steady-state solution for the average photon number in the cavity, ##n_C##, and the average phonon number in the mirror, ##n_M## as a function of detuning. For this, I used QUTIP and obtained, with the y-axis on log scale (see attachment).This is the typical Lorentzian resonance curve. Now, we clearly see that there are peaks corresponding to ##\Delta = \omega_m$## and ##\Delta = 0##.
I understand the peak at ##\Delta = 0## as then there are lots of photons inside the cavity, so we have a high average photon number and thus a high effective coupling to the mirror, as ##g_0 * n_a## is large.

What I don't understand, however, is why the second peak at ##+\omega_m## is as high as the first peak. Clearly there, we have ##\omega_{in} = \omega_C + \omega_m##, such that the photon - phonon scattering process is resonant. But why has it the same height?

From what I see, if we have (on average) as many phonons in the mirror at ##\Delta = \omega_m## as at ##\Delta = 0##, then the effective coupling strength at both detunings should be equal. But clearly, in the former case there are less photons in the cavity, as they are not resonant with the cavity frequency?
 

Attachments

  • HW2_3_3b_final.png
    HW2_3_3b_final.png
    13.1 KB · Views: 169
Physics news on Phys.org
LionCereals said:
I am considering the following Hamiltonian:
$$H = -\Delta a^{\dagger}a + \omega_m b^{\dagger}b + g_0 * a^{\dagger}a (b + b^{\dagger})$$
which is the interaction picture optomechanical Hamiltonian for a cavity with movable end mirror.
May I know where did you find this Hamiltonian? Would you cite the paper/book?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K