Why Aren't E-Book Readers Free with Book Purchases?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the perceived high costs of e-book readers and their associated books, with participants expressing frustration over the pricing model. Users argue that e-books should be significantly cheaper, ideally priced at $1-$2, to reflect the lack of production costs compared to physical books. The conversation highlights a sentiment that consumers feel "ripped off" by current pricing strategies and suggests that market forces will eventually drive prices down. Additionally, some users express a preference for physical books over e-books, citing sentimental value and usability concerns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of e-book pricing models
  • Familiarity with e-reader devices such as Kindle and NOOK
  • Knowledge of digital publishing trends
  • Awareness of consumer behavior in digital markets
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the pricing strategies of major e-book retailers like Amazon and Apple
  • Explore the impact of digital publishing on traditional book sales
  • Investigate consumer preferences between e-books and physical books
  • Learn about the features and benefits of various e-reader devices
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for consumers considering e-readers, digital publishers analyzing market trends, and anyone interested in the evolving landscape of book consumption and pricing strategies.

  • #31
I am bit old school and love having book in my hand ... kindle can never replace a real book for me. Kindle also devalues the book, I noticed I value things less when they are easy to access and large in quantity.

I love books like the evo posted above!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Evo said:
Have you seen that commercial? The girl says my purse holds 2 books, a couple of newspapers and a magazine, and the guy says that his kindle holds 3,500 books, newspapers, etc... It has nothing to do with the number of books they have available, it is what they equate the storage capacity to be.

It's a stupid commercial.
OK. Conceded. :smile:
 
  • #33
Evo said:
Have you seen that commercial? The girl says my purse holds 2 books, a couple of newspapers and a magazine, and the guy says that his kindle holds 3,500 books, newspapers, etc... It has nothing to do with the number of books they have available, it is what they equate the storage capacity to be.

It's a stupid commercial.

Sorry, telling me that it can hold 3,500 books is not a selling point because it's not a realistic requirement.

You give people too much credit. :smile:

For comparison, what commercial would you say presents only the facts about a particular product with no sugar coating or no out-of-context message?

It's widely acknowledged that eBooks aren't for everyone. I don't see why you feel the need to justify your opposition to it based on advertising. Have you ever actually used one?
 
  • #34
I love my Kobo (the second generation one with the WiFi), though now that there's a new touch Kobo (third generation), the sheen has gone off of mine a little.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobo_eReader

It's great for recreational reading, but I don't think I'd ever trade my physical text / reference books in.
 
  • #35
fss said:
For comparison, what commercial would you say presents only the facts about a particular product with no sugar coating or no out-of-context message?

It's widely acknowledged that eBooks aren't for everyone. I don't see why you feel the need to justify your opposition to it based on advertising. Have you ever actually used one?
I was watching tv shows online and this commercial was repeated every 10 minutes, for 3 hours. Sometimes it would air two times in a row before the show resumed. It got really annoying after the first hour. :-p I kept thinking, this tells me absolutely nothing useful about this product, and after watching it so many times, it got so annoying that it actually turned me off to the product.
 
  • #36
Evo said:
I was watching tv shows online and this commercial was repeated every 10 minutes, for 3 hours. Sometimes it would air two times in a row before the show resumed. It got really annoying after the first hour. :-p I kept thinking, this tells me absolutely nothing useful about this product, and after watching it so many times, it got so annoying that it actually turned me off to the product.

But I'll bet you remember the name of the product.
 
  • #37
wuliheron said:
But I'll bet you remember the name of the product.
:biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K