Why Choose an I Section Over a Square Section for Load-Bearing Applications?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Analysis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Section Square
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
Analysis
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Dear all

Apart from cost saving (or reduction in material)what is the technical advantage using I section instead of square section?

My application is,section is going to be simply supported to the static load.myself awared that I section is good for bending loads.Instead i am using square section,so my area moment of inertia will be high,the bending stress would be low.

Kindly comment the above subject.

Thanks
Prakash
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I use square sections when I want a cleaner or more attractive design, or when I have a bending component in the other plan. Less surface area collects less dust and is easier to wash down. When galvanizing less surface area uses less and is easier to ensure a uniform coating.
 
The most important reason to use an "I beam" (or "I section") is that it has much less volume and so much less weight than a square section of the same dimensions. And, since such things as "bending moment" depend upon the length in varying directions rather than volume, you don't lose strength.
 
I beam definitely is an obvious choice for situations where bending moment is of prime concern. As long as following conditions are not true, you can always go for I-beam:

1: Manufacturing: Normally i beams are not available in smaller section and hard to join (welding etc)

2: I beam is a poor choice where you have loads acting transversely to the length of beam.