Why do bound systems have less rest mass than the sum of its parts?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of mass deficit in bound systems, specifically why bound systems, such as hydrogen atoms, have less rest mass than the sum of their constituent particles. Participants also explore whether it is possible to determine the state of particles (bound vs. free) within a closed system without disturbing it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that when particles come together, energy is released as binding energy, leading to a mass deficit according to Einstein's relation E=mc².
  • Others propose that measuring the mass of a closed box containing a proton and an electron could indicate whether they are in a bound state, as the mass would differ from the sum of their individual masses if they are bound.
  • There is a challenge regarding whether it is possible to discern the state of the particles without opening the box, with some suggesting that the mass would remain the same regardless of the binding state if no energy escapes.
  • Some participants mention that in principle, other indicators such as temperature or external electric fields could provide clues about the binding state, but these methods rely on the system not being perfectly closed.
  • One participant suggests observing the recoil of the box when particles bounce off the walls as a potential method to infer the type of particles inside.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of determining the binding state of particles in a closed system without disturbance. While there is some agreement on the concept of mass deficit, the methods for discerning particle states remain contested and unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the idealization of closed systems and the assumptions involved in measuring mass and energy within such systems.

dimwatt
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi PF. This a fact well aware to just about anyone that has had even basic chemistry, but I'm having a hard time coming to an understanding as to why this must be true. So why?

Also, if I knew that some box contained, say, a proton and an electron, could I ever know whether or not, inside the box, the proton and the electron are in a bound state (hydrogen, as opposed to just two free particles) without puncturing or tampering with the boundaries of the box?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the parts come together energy is released. That energy is called binding energy. To pull them apart the same amount of energy must now be provided. If the energy is not provided, the parts can't move apart - they are bound. By Einstein's relation E=mc2 the energy lost in the binding process corresponds to an amount of lost mass - called the mass deficit. Therefore the bound system contains less mass than the sum of its parts.
 
dimwatt said:
Also, if I knew that some box contained, say, a proton and an electron, could I ever know whether or not, inside the box, the proton and the electron are in a bound state (hydrogen, as opposed to just two free particles) without puncturing or tampering with the boundaries of the box?

Yes, you could put the box on a scale and measure its mass. The hydrogen is lighter than the sum of the masses of the proton and electron.
 
dauto said:
Yes, you could put the box on a scale and measure its mass. The hydrogen is lighter than the sum of the masses of the proton and electron.

True but whether or not the particles "came together" no energy escaped the box, so it would have the same mass. One way we could tell is by opening the box and finding out if it weighs less than it did before opening, in which case the binding energy escaped in the form of heat or radiation or something like that. But I'm asking if there is anyway to discern between hydrogen and proton+electron (free) without disturbing the closed system.
 
dimwatt said:
True but whether or not the particles "came together" no energy escaped the box, so it would have the same mass. One way we could tell is by opening the box and finding out if it weighs less than it did before opening, in which case the binding energy escaped in the form of heat or radiation or something like that. But I'm asking if there is anyway to discern between hydrogen and proton+electron (free) without disturbing the closed system.

It's really hard to construct such an ideally closed system, but if you could then you are right: the mass of the box plus its contents would be the same whether the particles are bound (there's a hydrogen atom and some energy in the form of light/heat in the box) or unbound (there's a proton and an electron and the same energy in the form of an electrical field between them in the box).

There are other ways, in principle, of distinguishing the two cases; for example, the temperature of the box will be different; the electrical field outside the box will be different. However, they all depend, one way or another, on the box not being a perfect ideally closed system.
 
dimwatt said:
True but whether or not the particles "came together" no energy escaped the box, so it would have the same mass. One way we could tell is by opening the box and finding out if it weighs less than it did before opening, in which case the binding energy escaped in the form of heat or radiation or something like that. But I'm asking if there is anyway to discern between hydrogen and proton+electron (free) without disturbing the closed system.

You could look for the recoil of the box every time some particle inside if bounces off the walls and infer what kind of particles are inside
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K