MHB Why Do Different Calculations of a Probability Problem Yield Different Results?

  • Thread starter Thread starter schinb65
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability that a randomly chosen person owns either an automobile or a house, but not both, based on survey data. The correct answer is determined to be 0.5, which can be confirmed using both a Venn Diagram and the probability formula. The formula used is \(P[A \cup B] - P[A \cap B]\), which simplifies to \(P[A] + P[B] - 2P[A \cap B]\). Participants confirm that both methods yield the same result of 0.5, validating the calculations. Understanding the correct application of the probability formula is essential for accurate results.
schinb65
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A marketing survey indicates that 60% of the population owns
an automobile, 30% owns a house, and 20% owns both an automobile and a house.
Calculate the probability that a person chosen at random owns an automobile or a house, but not
both.

I am Told that the answer is .5, I did this problem 2 different ways and I received different answers, and .5 is one of the answers.

If I draw a Venn Diagram I receive .5 and that makes sense.
I also tried this, \(P[A\cup B]=P[A]+P-P[A \cap B]\),
I assume that I have something incorrect in the formula since I do not get the right answer. Would I be able to use this formula?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to MHB, schinb65!

schinb65 said:
A marketing survey indicates that 60% of the population owns
an automobile, 30% owns a house, and 20% owns both an automobile and a house.
Calculate the probability that a person chosen at random owns an automobile or a house, but not
both.

I am Told that the answer is .5, I did this problem 2 different ways and I received different answers, and .5 is one of the answers.

If I draw a Venn Diagram I receive .5 and that makes sense.
I also tried this, \(P[A\cup B]=P[A]+P-P[A \cap B]\),
I assume that I have something incorrect in the formula since I do not get the right answer. Would I be able to use this formula?


A Venn Diagram is best. ;)

But yes, you can also use that formula.
\begin{aligned}
P[\text{A or B but not both}] &= P[A\cup B]-P[A \cap B] \\
&=\big(P[A]+P-P[A \cap B]\big)-P[A \cap B] \\
&=P[A]+P-2P[A \cap B] \\
&=60\%+30\%-2\times 20\% \\
&=50\% \\
\end{aligned}
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top