High School Why do equations with two distinct variables with 2 distinct

Click For Summary
Equations with two distinct variables can yield solutions based on their geometric representation as lines. When two lines intersect, they have a common solution, while identical lines represent infinite solutions, and parallel lines indicate no solution. The process of solving an equation simplifies finding these intersections without trial and error. In the provided example, substituting one variable allows for a single-variable equation, making it easier to find a solution. Understanding these relationships clarifies why certain equations can be solved while others cannot.
navneet9431
My question is about basic algebra. I am thinking about the "why" here and I'm looking for an intuitive answer.If you have the following equations:
=>S+U=90
=>S+U=90
and
=>40S+25U=2625
=>40S+25U=2625
you can then rewrite S=90−U and then substitute.

Now you have a single equation with one variable:
=>40(90−U)+25=2625
=>3600−40U+25U=2625
=>−15U=−975
Hence, U=65What's going on here? Ultimately, why does this always solve out? I realize single equations with one variable solve (there's got to be some number that satisfies this equation), but why? What's going on? I guess by solving the equation, we're bypassing this repetitive process of trial and error of plugging in numbers and seeing if it equals 2625? Is that what "solving the equation" really means?

Note: I am a High School student and English is my second language.Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
navneet9431 said:
My question is about basic algebra. I am thinking about the "why" here and I'm looking for an intuitive answer.If you have the following equations:
=>S+U=90
=>S+U=90
and
=>40S+25U=2625
=>40S+25U=2625
you can then rewrite S=90−U and then substitute.

Now you have a single equation with one variable:
=>40(90−U)+25=2625
=>3600−40U+25U=2625
=>−15U=−975
Hence, U=65What's going on here? Ultimately, why does this always solve out? I realize single equations with one variable solve (there's got to be some number that satisfies this equation), but why? What's going on? I guess by solving the equation, we're bypassing this repetitive process of trial and error of plugging in numbers and seeing if it equals 2625? Is that what "solving the equation" really means?

Note: I am a High School student and English is my second language.Thanks!
It does not always work. E.g. ##2x+y=0## and ##4x+2y=0## won't work. Geometrically you consider two straights here. They can cross each other as in your example, can be identical as in mine, or parallel. In the first case we find the point which is on both straights. It is like walking along one straight (equation 1) and then look where it crosses the other (equation 2, without leaving the first). In the second case (my example), you get back only one equation, that is one single, entire straight. And in the last case they don't have points in common. Parallelity results in a contradiction, e.g. ##2x+y=2## and ##4x+2y=5##. No point ##(x,y)## satisfies both equations, i.e. lies on both straights if they are parallel.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
41K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K