Why Do Some Months Have 30 or 31 Days While February Has 28?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mreq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical and astronomical reasons for the varying number of days in months, particularly focusing on the Roman calendar's influence and the relationship between the position of the sun and calendar days. Participants explore concepts related to calendar systems, historical transitions between calendars, and the implications of these changes on astronomical observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the variation in month lengths is rooted in the Roman calendar, influenced by superstitions regarding even numbers.
  • Others discuss the historical context of calendar changes, including the transition from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar and its effects on date alignment with the sun.
  • Questions arise about whether specific days correlate with the sun's position in the sky across different years.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about how astronomical software handles historical calendar discrepancies.
  • There are inquiries about the Earth's position in its orbit relative to the sun on specific historical dates and whether this can be calculated accurately.
  • One participant mentions the Tropical year and its significance in calendar calculations, particularly regarding equinoxes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement on various points, particularly regarding the implications of calendar changes and the relationship between calendar days and solar positions. The discussion remains unresolved on several technical aspects, with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the vagueness of some questions posed by participants and the dependence on historical definitions of calendar systems. There are unresolved mathematical steps regarding the calculation of Earth's position in its orbit over time.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying history, astronomy, or calendar systems, as well as individuals curious about the relationship between timekeeping and celestial movements.

mreq
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hy.
Why some months have 30 and some 31 days , and february 28?
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Why not? This has nothing to do with physics or mathematics- it is mostly due to the Roman calendar- a matter of history.
 
Google:
When Rome emerged as a world power, the difficulties of making a calendar were well known, but the Romans complicated their lives because of their superstition that even numbers were unlucky. Hence their months were 29 or 31 days long, with the exception of February, which had 28 days. However, four months of 31 days, seven months of 29 days, and one month of 28 days added up to only 355 days. Therefore the Romans invented an extra month called Mercedonius of 22 or 23 days. It was added every second year.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0002061.html
...it evolved slightly from there.
 
Can be each day associated with the position of the sun ?
 
I mean if 15th of june the sun have the same position or something close to 15th of july and to 15th of august and so on.
 
Last edited:
mreq do you mean to ask if there is a calendar based on various alignments of the heavenly bodies?
 
What i want to know it's if there is a connection between sun position and the number of the day? Let's say 1 june 2000, 1 june 2001, 1 june 2002, 1 june 2003 etc.
If the sun coordinates are the same.
 
mreq said:
What i want to know it's if there is a connection between sun position and the number of the day? Let's say 1 june 2000, 1 june 2001, 1 june 2002, 1 june 2003 etc.
If the sun coordinates are the same.

Close, but not exact. The mean Tropical year is 365.24219 days long, which means that after four years, the Sun has drifted almost 1 day in position. This is why we have leap years; We add an extra day to the year every four years to tweak the Sun's position and calendar day back into sync. This however over compensates a bit, so our present calendar the Gregorian one, omits the leap day for years that are evenly divided by 400.( Thus the year 2000, which normally should have been a leap year by the four year rule, was not.)
The previous calendar, the Julian, did not have this slight correction, so when Britain and the American colonies switched to the Gregorian calendar in 1751, it was 11 days out of sync with the Sun. As a result of the switch, Sept 2 was followed by Sept 14 to re-align the date and Sun.

As you can imagine, this was disconcerting to some. Some people thought that several days of their lives were being taken away, and some landlords wanted to charge a full month's rent for September, while their tenants argued that they should only be charged for 19 days, etc.
 
  • #10
Ok.
How about 1th june 2000 and 1 th june 2005 ? Is the position of the sun the same ?

Let's took for example 10 february 1564. Judging by the position of the sun what day should coincide with that by the gregorian calendar.
 
  • #11
As Janus said, close but not exact. How exact do you want to get?
Janus said:
The previous calendar, the Julian, did not have this slight correction, so when Britain and the American colonies switched to the Gregorian calendar in 1751, it was 11 days out of sync with the Sun. As a result of the switch, Sept 2 was followed by Sept 14 to re-align the date and Sun.
Interesting, I had never heard that. I wonder how astronomy software deals with that? I would suspect they ignore such historical issues and just apply the modern calendar backwards.
 
  • #12
russ_watters said:
As Janus said, close but not exact. How exact do you want to get? Interesting, I had never heard that. I wonder how astronomy software deals with that? I would suspect they ignore such historical issues and just apply the modern calendar backwards.

juliangregor.png


Looks like they just apply the modern calendar backwards.
 
  • #13
Heh, duh, I should have realized how easily I could test that!
[...and Starry Night works the same way.]
 
  • #14
I think it would be pretty funny if it had "this date does not exist" or something of the sort.
 
  • #15
Agreed. But if any unscrupulous high school students read this thread, they may go start arguing with their teachers about what date certain historical events happened on. Magna Carta? June 15, 1215? Naah.
 
  • #16
russ_watters said:
Heh, duh, I should have realized how easily I could test that!
[...and Starry Night works the same way.]

I bet I can guess who manufactures your telescope. Hahahaha
 
  • #17
russ_watters said:
Agreed. But if any unscrupulous high school students read this thread, they may go start arguing with their teachers about what date certain historical events happened on. Magna Carta? June 15, 1215? Naah.

Well, not that early, as the Gregorian calendar was not introduced until 1582. However, the adoption was not universal. Countries slowly changed over; Russia used the Julian calendar until 1918 and Greece was the last to make the switch in 1923.
 
  • #18
KalamMekhar said:
I bet I can guess who manufactures your telescope. Hahahaha
Maybe/mabye not. When I bought Starry Night my primary scope was by one manufacturer and now I have a new one with a label that belies the fact that the OTA and mount are repackaged products from still two more manufacturers! So I've got a lot of major labels covered!
 
  • #19
Janus said:
Well, not that early, as the Gregorian calendar was not introduced until 1582.
Isn't that the point? What does it really mean to say that the Magna Carta was signed on June 15, 1215? According to the people who signed it? According to our new calendar scrolled backwards? And don't even get me started on Christmas. It is bad enough that it isn't known when exactly Jesus was born, but why was December 25th chosen? According to the Wiki it may be because that was the date of the winter solstice in the Roman calendar. But if that's the case, that means calendar changes have moved Christmas so that it is now 4 days later.
 
  • #20
KalamMekhar said:
I think it would be pretty funny if it had "this date does not exist" or something of the sort.

The unix cal command

$ cal 9 1752
September 1752
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
 
  • #21
If i take a date let's say 15th january 1540. What was the Earth position on the orbit (regarding the sun) that day, and now in 2010 when the Earth is in the same position ?

And another question is Where on the orbit is let's say february ?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Positions are calculated with the Earth as the reference.

You haven't tried the program yet, have you?
 
  • #23
Hmm...
So there isn't a fixed point ?

P.S. Are this things possible with some software ? Which one ?
 
  • #24
mreq said:
Hmm...
So there isn't a fixed point ?

P.S. Are this things possible with some software ? Which one ?
mreq, you have another thread open where people suggested software to you! Try it!

Based on the vagueness of the questions you are asking and your inability to properly convey what you are looking for or why, it doesn't appear you really know what you are looking for. So the best thing for you to do is to try the software, see what information it gives you and see if it is of value to you. We can't spoon-feed this to you if you don't even know what you want!
 
  • #25
Lets try i tthis way too:
mreq said:
If i take a date let's say 15th january 1540. What was the Earth position on the orbit (regarding the sun) that day, and now in 2010 when the Earth is in the same position ?
On Jan 15, 1540 at noon, from the earth, the sun is at:

RA: 20h, 54.17m
DEC: -17deg 29.54m

Was this information helpful to you?
 
  • #26
I'm new to astronomy! So i need to learn terminology. And that 's what i do all day on google. Because i don't know where to find it! And i want things to move faster.
 
  • #27
How the Earth movement was calculated ? How they know the point of the start at each ear ?
 
Last edited:
  • #28
The Tropical year, which the calendar is based upon, goes from equinox to equinox (fall to fall or spring to spring). The equinoxes, are when the tilt of the Earth is neither towards or away from the Sun, and the Sun passes directly overhead on the Equator. They corresponds with the days where we get 12hrs of light and 12 hrs of dark. Generally the spring equinox signals the start of the tropical year. (In earlier times, the calendar year also started around this time, on April first. After it was switched to January 1st, to be close to the Winter Solstice, some people mistakenly continued to celebrate the new year on April 1st. They were derisively called "April Fools", and thus was born the tradition of April's Fools Day.)

So the Earth's position is generally measured from the spring equinox.
 
  • #29
Janus said:
The Tropical year, which the calendar is based upon, goes from equinox to equinox (fall to fall or spring to spring). The equinoxes, are when the tilt of the Earth is neither towards or away from the Sun, and the Sun passes directly overhead on the Equator. They corresponds with the days where we get 12hrs of light and 12 hrs of dark. Generally the spring equinox signals the start of the tropical year. (In earlier times, the calendar year also started around this time, on April first. After it was switched to January 1st, to be close to the Winter Solstice, some people mistakenly continued to celebrate the new year on April 1st. They were derisively called "April Fools", and thus was born the tradition of April's Fools Day.)

So the Earth's position is generally measured from the spring equinox.

So the position on the orbit is not the same the next year ?
 
  • #30
mreq said:
So the position on the orbit is not the same the next year ?

It depends on what you use as a "year". A mean sidereal year is the time it takes for the Earth to return to the same position relative to the stars and is 365 days 6 hrs 9 min 9.7676 sec long.

A mean tropical year is 365 days 5 hrs 48 min 45 s long.

A calendar year is either 365 or 356 days long depending on whether or not it is a leap year or not.

So on average, the tropical year is ~20 min shorter than the sidereal year. So the seasons and the position of the Earth relative to the stars drift slowly out of sync. The difference is small and comes to about 1/37 the width of the Moon per year.

I said "on average" because due to various influences on the Earth by other bodies in the Solar System, the exact duration of these "years" can fluctuate slightly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K