Why do strings have to exist in 10 dimensions?

11thDimension
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
so i came across string theory and i don't understand (if your going to go along with it) why it is tiny strings that make up the universe and why exactly do they have to exist in more then 4 dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
11thDimension said:
so i came across string theory and i don't understand (if your going to go along with it) why it is tiny strings that make up the universe...

In a very simplified nutshell:

The theory of relativity and quantum mechanics - two of the most carefully tested and confirmed models ever developed in scientific history - turn out to be incompatible.

If you try to resolve relativity over the subatomic distances where quantum theory applies, you get infinities. To oversimplify further, QM says that the smaller you look, the larger the uncertainty. Relativity, on the other hand requires zero-dimensional, infinitely small point particles. Put those two together and you get particle interactions (i.e. energy transfers) that are arbitrarily large and occur over zero time, i.e. infinite energy transfer. This makes no sense.

String theory proposes that particles are not zero-dimensional, but instead are one-dimensional (strings). This neatly resolves the whole issue, since it spreads any and all interactions over a non-zero distance and non-zero time.

As for the extra dimensions, well, the properties of matter (such as mass, spin, etc) are manifestations of the vibrations of the strings. These vibrations need these extra dimensions in order to vibrate (read about Kaluza -Klein theory).
 
Last edited:
so why do these strings also have to be able to exist in 11 dimensions
 
11thDimension said:
so why do these strings also have to be able to exist in 11 dimensions

I'm not an expert, but it's my understanding that there is no a priori reason that the strings must exist in 11 dimensions, it's a requirement for the theory to fit with predictions. I could be mistaken of course.
 
11thDimension said:
so why do these strings also have to be able to exist in 11 dimensions
They don't. They exist in 10 dimensions. 11 is the number of dimensions in M-theory, which is believed to be more fundamental than string theory.

Of course, now you will ask why 10? Well, classical string theory is well defined in any number of dimensions. However, some symmetries (like Lorentz invariance) may achieve anomalies when a classical theory is quantized. Anomalies destroy the symmetries, so you don't want them. It turns out that anomalies cancel in 10 dimensions only. That's why you need 10.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top