Chemistry Why Do Sulfurous Compounds Show Different Peaks in X-ray Absorption Spectra?

AI Thread Summary
Sulfurous compounds exhibit different peaks in X-ray absorption spectra due to variations in oxidation states and molecular configurations. The discussion highlights confusion regarding sodium thiosulfate, which shows two main peaks attributed to sulfur atoms in different oxidation states (-1 and +5). In contrast, magnetite only shows one peak despite having iron in multiple oxidation states (+2 and +3). This discrepancy raises questions about the relationship between oxidation states and spectral peaks. Further clarification on the interpretation of these spectra is sought, particularly regarding the behavior of thiosulfate compared to iron compounds.
feelice
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Interpretation of X-ray absorption spectra
Relevant Equations
none
Hey guys :)

actually my homework was just to research the absorption spectra of some iron compounds and some sulfurus compounds - to which I have the answer. I just dont understand it. In this arcticle, fig 2b: "Phase Composition of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Studied Using Hard X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy" the needed FeO, hematite and magnetite are listet. It was explained to the course, that roughly the oxidation state is added to the shift of the Fe-K-absorption edge which fits, also that tetrahedral conformation will lead to a pre peak, which also fits.
Now we come to the sulfurous compounds. In this article, fig.3b: "In Situ Analysis of Sulfur Species in Sulfur Globules Produced from Thiosulfate by Thermoanaerobacter sulfurigignens and Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes", the sodium thiosulfate is somehow not fitting in for me. Why does ist have two main peaks - if you say because on sulfur has the oxidation state -1 and the other plus 5, then why does magnetite only have on peak even though it has one iron in oxidation stat +2 and the other two in +3. Why do we split in thiosulfate?

It really bothers me and I would be very glad if someone could help me solve this puzzle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
feelice said:
Homework Statement: Interpretation of X-ray absorption spectra
Relevant Equations: none

In this arcticle, fig 2b:

do you have links to the 2 articles you are reading, please
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top