Why do we add probabilities instead of squaring the amplitude sum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Rules
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
12 replies · 2K views
bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See q attached

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So basically... my questions is this:

I thought that the rule in quantum for p(A or B) is that A(A or B) = A(A) + A(B) then you square [A(A) + A(B)] to find p(A or B) (where A(X) is amplitude of X)

But then surely the sum of the amplitudes all squared must = 1 rather than sum of amplitudes squared added..
i.e. in this example surely it would be that |(a+b)^2| = 1 rather than |a^2| + |b^2| =1 ?
but i think the latter is the right method...

please help!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
so why is the 'quantum rule' that you add amplidues for different ways of an event happening..i.e.
A(A or B) = A(A) + A(B) then you square [A(A) + A(B)] to find p(A or B)

so p(A or B) = p(A) + p(B) + I (interference term)
..
 
Bendavid2 said:
No 0 e^PIi squared is 1 so a=0

sorry - posted the wrong q - meant this one...part b
 

Attachments

Yup I think so. Chance of finding it in well 0 is 1/2 due symmetrie both side are even so 1/4 + 1/2 is 3/4 so yup.
 
Bendavid2 said:
Yup I think so. Chance of finding it in well 0 is 1/2 due symmetrie both side are even so 1/4 + 1/2 is 3/4 so yup.

sorry to be a pain. thanks for you help.. also stuck on q11 c
 

Attachments