Why does adding rows to find determinant change the equation result?

  • Thread starter Seneka
  • Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3x3 Matrix
4 replies · 3K views · last reply
Seneka
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The problem and the statement are attached. I found the solution as shown in the attached files but I don't understand why in the solutions they added R1 and R3 to get a row equivalent to R1. Problem is Q4.
Relevant Equations
-
243408
 
Attachments
  • Worked solution on a screen: determinant of matrix M with rows (-1, 2k-5, -2), (1+k, -1, k-1), (1, 1, 2) row-reduced via R1 to R1+R3 to a 3x3 determinant, giving -(2k-4)(3+k), and a system with k = 2 solved.
    IMG_20190511_201252.jpg
    72.9 KB · Views: 310
  • Screenshot of a textbook exercise on a Cambridge Elevate page showing linear systems of three equations in x, y, z with parameter k, parts 4 to 6 and their sub-questions.
    IMG_20190511_201246.jpg
    102.1 KB · Views: 328
In the solution, they are taking the determinant to see if the matrix is singular. One of the three row operations you can do on determinants is replacing a row by the sum of itself and another row. The other two row operations are switching two rows, and replacing a row by a multiple of itself.
The reason they replaced R1 by R1 + R3 was to get a zero entry in the first row, which makes finding the determinant easier.
 
Mark44 said:
In the solution, they are taking the determinant to see if the matrix is singular. One of the three row operations you can do on determinants is replacing a row by the sum of itself and another row. The other two row operations are switching two rows, and replacing a row by a multiple of itself.
The reason they replaced R1 by R1 + R3 was to get a zero entry in the first row, which makes finding the determinant easier.

But won't that change the value of R1 which will be equal to 3 instead of 2.
 
Seneka said:
But won't that change the value of R1 which will be equal to 3 instead of 2.

Yes. The two equations combined to give an equation which now says 0 = 3, with a right hand side of 3.

The right-hand side doesn't matter in deciding if the determinant is 0, but it does matter if determining whether the system has zero or infinitely many solutions. 0 = 3 is a contradiction, so this system is inconsistent, no solutions. If you got 0 = 0 would be true for all x, y, z.
 
Thanks @RPinPA @Mark44

I was more confused as to why row switching worked. A nice explanation I found was by looking at what the determinant does. By looking at a simple two by two the determinant will give you an area of a parallelogram. When you add a row to another one that creates a parallelogram with the same area and therefore doesn't change the value of the determinant.