Why does Chromium oxide form before ferrous oxide?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HyperSniper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Chromium oxide forms on stainless steel at a faster rate than ferrous oxide due to chromium's position on the electrochemical series, with an electrode potential of -0.744 compared to iron's -0.037. This indicates that chromium is a superior reducing agent, resulting in lower activation energy and quicker reaction rates. The formation of the chromium oxide layer leads to passivation, which protects the underlying steel from oxidation. If the chromium layer is compromised, the risk of rust formation increases, depending on the type of stainless steel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of oxidation reactions
  • Familiarity with electrochemical series
  • Knowledge of electrode potential concepts
  • Basic principles of passivation in metals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the electrochemical series and its implications for corrosion resistance
  • Study the kinetics of oxidation reactions in metals
  • Explore the concept of passivation and its role in stainless steel protection
  • Investigate different types of stainless steel and their corrosion resistance properties
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, materials scientists, corrosion engineers, and anyone interested in the properties and behavior of stainless steel in various environments.

HyperSniper
Messages
39
Reaction score
2
It's been a while since I've had a Chemistry class, and I've been trying to get a more detailed answer as to how stainless steel works. Specifically, why does Chromium oxide form on stainless steel at a rate faster than that of rust (ferrous oxide)? What determines the rate at which these two reactions take place?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
HyperSniper said:
It's been a while since I've had a Chemistry class, and I've been trying to get a more detailed answer as to how stainless steel works. Specifically, why does Chromium oxide form on stainless steel at a rate faster than that of rust (ferrous oxide)? What determines the rate at which these two reactions take place?
I don't know, but I suspect you have the right words in asking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_rate" explains the difference in the rate of the two reactions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, looks like those two things look like good places to start investigating. Thanks.

If I find come to a good enough answer I'll come back and post it. If I haven't posted anything yet, that probably means I don't know. So if any kind soul would like to enlighten us go ahead an post an explanation in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I think I know what the reason is now. The thing I overlooked was the fact that they are both oxidation reactions, so it would be little bit easier to compare them that way.

Chromium oxide forms faster than ferrous oxide is because of Chromium's postion on the electrochemical series. Chromium has an electrode potential of -0.744 while iron has an electrode potential of -0.037, which means Chromium is a better reducing agent. Part of the reason that the electrode potential is greater is because there are less electrons to remove from the outter most energy level. Therefore, the activation energy is far less, which means that the reaction is a lot faster.

Have I overlooked anything or made a mistake in my reasoning?
 
Last edited:
Chromium is also more reducing than Iron, so its oxidation is favorite energetically.
 
I don't think it is rate of the reaction that counts here. From what I know once chromium oxide layer covers the steel it isolates it from the atmospheric oxygen, this is called passivation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, the rate of the reaction definitely counts for something. If the stainless steel is scratched lightly it still won't develop rust. If you scratch it too much it may rust because there is not enough chromium to prevent it though, depending on what type of stainless steel it is.

When it is first made no passivation layer is put on the metal, it develops on its own. It develops because the reaction is faster than that of ferrous oxide, therefore preventing the iron from oxidizing.

If I've got time later I'll try and get some math and citations up to prove this.
 
Intuition tells me it doesn't have to be faster to prevent iron oxidation, but if you will find something more reliable than intuition - that's OK with me :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
29K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K