Why Does Commuting Operators Require Test Functions in Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of test functions in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of commuting operators such as position, momentum, and angular momentum. Participants explore the necessity of test functions for certain commutation relations and the implications of their use in calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the requirement of test functions for commuting position operators with momentum or angular momentum, questioning why this is not necessary for momentum and angular momentum. There are attempts to clarify the role of test functions in deriving commutation relations from fundamental principles versus using known relations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into when test functions are necessary and exploring different perspectives on the topic. Some participants suggest that algebraic methods may suffice in certain cases, while others emphasize the utility of test functions for general formulas.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the complexity involved in angular momentum calculations, particularly regarding the coordinates involved. The discussion also touches on the distinction between calculating commutation relations from scratch versus leveraging existing knowledge.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Why is it that I have to use a test function for commuting a position operator with either momentum or angular momentum, but I don't necessarily have to use a test function for commuting the momentum operator with angular momentum?

In the first case, it doesn't make sense if you don't have a test function. You need a test function to prove that [xi, pj] = i*h-bar*kronecker deltaij.

Why is the test function f = f(xi, xj)? Where i is not equal to j.

I hope that makes sense.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need a test function when you want to calculate the commutation relations "from scratch". If you calculate commutation relations of some functions (polynomials) of operators of which the commutation relations you already know, then algebra is enough.

As for you last question - each angular momentum component involves two different coordinates.
 
arkajad said:
You need a test function when you want to calculate the commutation relations "from scratch". If you calculate commutation relations of some functions (polynomials) of operators of which the commutation relations you already know, then algebra is enough.

As for you last question - each angular momentum component involves two different coordinates.

Well, for the momentum, I worked it out with a test function and without a test function. They both worked out correctly, so I assume you can correctly work out the momentum/angular momentum commutation relations without using a test function.
 
Once you got momentum-positions commutation relations the rest can be reduced to the pure algebra, possibly with series expansions if you want to calculate commutators like [p,f(x)]

But if you want to calculate a general formula for,say, [p,f(x)], then using a test function is handy.
 
well..n physics, angular momentum, moment of momentum, or rotational momentum[1][2] is a conserved vector quantity that can be used to describe the overall state of a physical system. The angular momentum L of a particle with respect to some point of origin is

\mathbf{L} = \mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{p} = \mathbf{r} \times m\mathbf{v}\, ,

where r is the particle's position from the origin, p = mv is its linear momentum, and × denotes the cross product.

The angular momentum of a system of particles (e.g. a rigid body) is the sum of angular momenta of the individual particles. For a rigid body rotating around an axis of symmetry (e.g. the fins of a ceiling fan), the angular momentum can be expressed as the product of the body's moment of inertia I (a measure of an object's resistance to changes in its rotation rate) and its angular velocity ω:
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K