L²Cc Messages 149 Reaction score 0 Thread starter Oct 26, 2006 #1 do you have an explanation to why sometimes the general term formula for geometric sequence is not raised to n-1 but to simply n?
do you have an explanation to why sometimes the general term formula for geometric sequence is not raised to n-1 but to simply n?
courtrigrad Messages 1,236 Reaction score 2 Oct 26, 2006 #2 because you could have [tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} ar^{n}[/tex] or [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} ar^{n-1}[/tex] Or [tex]\sum_{n=k}^{\infty} ar^{n-k}[/tex] Last edited: Oct 26, 2006
because you could have [tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} ar^{n}[/tex] or [tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} ar^{n-1}[/tex] Or [tex]\sum_{n=k}^{\infty} ar^{n-k}[/tex]
L²Cc Messages 149 Reaction score 0 Oct 26, 2006 #3 oh ok...so from what I understood, if the sequence starts at zero then the formula raised to n because if it was n-1 then it will read -1, right?
oh ok...so from what I understood, if the sequence starts at zero then the formula raised to n because if it was n-1 then it will read -1, right?