Chemistry Why Does Grignard Addition to Esters Form Ketones?

  • Thread starter Thread starter duchuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why Grignard addition to esters results in ketones rather than alcohols. The formation of a tetrahedral intermediate is favored, but the reaction proceeds towards ketone formation due to the stability of the resulting products and the assistance of MgBr+ in facilitating the departure of the alkoxide. Hemiketals, formed during the reaction, are unstable in the presence of water, leading to their reversion to ketones. Additionally, the reactivity of ketones compared to esters makes them more favorable targets for further Grignard reactions. Ultimately, careful control of Grignard reagent addition can yield ketones as products.
duchuy
Messages
79
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
x
Relevant Equations
2 mechanisms proposed below
Hi,
I have a question regarding these 2 possibilities: Why does the addition of RMgX on an ester always form a ketone? We could very well have that tetrahedral intermediate without eliminating the alcoolate group no? Since your reaction pretty much always tend towards the formation of a weaker base, the second reaction goes from carbanion like molecule to a neutral molecule, whilst the first textbook way would form an alcoolate?
Please explain to me what is the motor for the 1st reaction so that the reaction would preferably go that way instead of the second one.
Thank you so much for your help.

1640675693178.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the mechanism you have proposed for #2… this is a hemiketal. It is not a happy camper. You can force it to become a ketal (two -OR groups) under desiccating conditions and in the presence of more alcohol but you have just finished adding water and there is little free alcohol around! Hemiketals decompose back to their ketone origins in the presence of water. Actually there is an equilibrium between the ketone/alcohol and hemiketal but it is heavily weighted toward the ketone/alcohol.

#1 is correct. Don’t forget that the MgBr+ is nearby to assist the alkoxide leaving. So the normally poor OR- leaving group has some help both from the soon-to-be carbonyl oxygen’s lone pair and the metal salt.
 
  • Like
Likes duchuy and jim mcnamara
chemisttree said:
For the mechanism you have proposed for #2… this is a hemiketal. It is not a happy camper. You can force it to become a ketal (two -OR groups) under desiccating conditions and in the presence of more alcohol but you have just finished adding water and there is little free alcohol around! Hemiketals decompose back to their ketone origins in the presence of water. Actually there is an equilibrium between the ketone/alcohol and hemiketal but it is heavily weighted toward the ketone/alcohol.

#1 is correct. Don’t forget that the MgBr+ is nearby to assist the alkoxide leaving. So the normally poor OR- leaving group has some help both from the soon-to-be carbonyl oxygen’s lone pair and the metal salt.
But if hemiketal turns back to ketone after I add water, and even ifI have alcohol in the solution, i'd no longer be able to turn that ketone into an alcohol no? Because all of my RMgX will be consumed from the moment I add water in the solution? So is it possible to end up with ketones as side products at the end of the reaction?
 
Yes, ketone is possible if one equivalent of grignard is slowly added to the ester. Done the other way around, you get a mixture of the tert alcohol and unchanged ester.
 
chemisttree said:
Yes, ketone is possible if one equivalent of grignard is slowly added to the ester. Done the other way around, you get a mixture of the tert alcohol and unchanged ester.
Something to consider: excessive dilution with the solvent will also likely improve yield for this method.
 
Also: ketones are considered more reactive than esters in this context. "The ketone is a more reactive intermediate than the ester itself". Hence, it is favorable for the Grignard reagent to attack the ketone over the ester.

1641918103542.png
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top