Why Does Matter Want Lowest Potential Energy?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter petmar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the fundamental question of why matter seeks the lowest potential energy state, linking it to the second law of thermodynamics. Participants argue that while the phenomenon is observable, the underlying reasons remain elusive, with some suggesting philosophical implications such as the anthropic principle. Warren emphasizes the importance of the scientific method, highlighting the necessity of formulating hypotheses and conducting experiments to explore such questions. The conversation also touches on the relationship between energy states and the curvature of space, suggesting a complex interplay between these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the scientific method and hypothesis formulation
  • Basic knowledge of potential energy concepts
  • Awareness of the anthropic principle in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the second law of thermodynamics in various physical systems
  • Research the anthropic principle and its applications in cosmology
  • Study the relationship between energy states and the curvature of space in general relativity
  • Investigate the role of hypotheses in scientific inquiry and experimental validation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers of science, students of thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles governing the behavior of matter and energy in the universe.

petmar
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
i know that all matter "wants" to go to least potential energy state. the big question is WHY?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
its the laws of physics, i think its the 2nd law of thermodynamics to be specific. there is no 'why?', it just is.

its like asking 'why do opposite charges attract each other?'. they just do, there is no 'why?'.

i think you can use the anthropic principle here. if matter didn't try to occupy the lowest energy state, our universe would not be the way it is and we would not be here to ask the question.
 
I don't completely agree, Fuego.

There must be a reason, we just don't know it. I think we should question everything. We may never be able to determine why, but if we don't even ask the question, then I know we won't answer it.
 
to know why would be to 'know the mind of god' as stephen hawking puts it.
 
This isn't science, it's philosophy. Every hypothesis posted here will be an irrefutable hypothesis. Science can do nothing with those.

- Warren
 
The following is a description of the scientific method. Please pay particular attention to number 2.

1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.

2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation.

3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.

4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.

It don't get much more scientific then that.
 
I see you do not understand what an irrefutable hypothesis is.

- Warren
 
It must first be posed.
 
Uh yeah... right... I think I'll let myself out of this train wreck of a thread. You morons have fun.

*door slams*

- Warren
 
  • #10
My point isn't to say that we will ever find the reason why for everytime we ask it, but it is how science works.

We wonder why, we come up with a possible reason and then we set out to prove it or at least mathmatically state it.

Without asking "why" we do not have theories or experimentation. Without those we do not have science.
 
  • #11
Originally posted by chroot
Uh yeah... right... I think I'll let myself out of this train wreck of a thread. You morons have fun.

*door slams*

- Warren

Well, I guess the King has left the building.
 
  • #12
i wonder if the door hit him on the way out...

lol
anyways, i was thinking that it might be due to the fact that space is essentially either flat, or of a set curvature, and since energy would distort that curvature, an elastic principle wants all points to go to the least possible energy state... just putting this one out there for the heck of it.

remember: this is a crackpot-less thread. no idea is too crazy.

(take that, chroot! )
 
  • #13
it might be due to the fact that space is essentially either flat, or of a set curvature, and since energy would distort that curvature, an elastic principle wants all points to go to the least possible energy state

that sounds like circular reasoning to me. any elastic principle already depends on the fact that matter tries to occupy lowest energy states.
 
  • #14
true enough...

i wonder, then, which is the cause, and which is the effect, of the elastic principle and the lowest energy state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
700
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
934
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K