Why does raising a number to the power of 0 always result in 1?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter OMGMathPLS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponent
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical concept of raising a number to the power of zero, exploring why any base raised to the power of zero results in one. Participants examine this concept through various explanations, including algebraic reasoning, properties of exponents, and interpretations involving negative bases and functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the reasoning behind why any base raised to the power of zero equals one, suggesting it may relate to counting the existence of the base.
  • One participant provides an algebraic explanation using the identity $\frac{x^2}{x^2} = 1$ to illustrate that $x^0 = 1$ for $x \neq 0$, emphasizing the law of subtraction for exponents.
  • Another participant reiterates the algebraic reasoning, noting that if the powers are the same, $\frac{a^m}{a^m} = a^0$ leads to $a^0 = 1$, while also mentioning that $0^0$ is undefined.
  • Concerns are raised about the treatment of negative bases, with discussions on why $(-2)^0$ results in 1 while $-1^0$ results in -1, highlighting the importance of parentheses in determining the order of operations.
  • A participant introduces an interpretation involving the concept of an empty function, suggesting that for the equation $\left|Y^X\right|=\left|Y\right|^{\left|X\right|}$ to hold when $X$ is empty, it follows that $\left|Y\right|^0=1$ for all non-negative integers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasoning behind the results for negative bases and the implications of exponent rules. While some explanations are agreed upon, particularly regarding the algebraic identities, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the conceptual understanding of negative bases raised to zero.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific mathematical properties and identities, but there is no consensus on the interpretation of negative bases or the implications of raising zero to the power of zero.

OMGMathPLS
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Why is base to power 0 always 1, even if it's .2^0 it =1?

Is it just counting the 1 time the .2 is existing? Is that why?And - base ^ 0 is negative whatever the number is so why is that not a negative one?

Because (-2)^2 is 4 but no because a negative times a negative is a positive.

And with parentheses -2^2 is -4, because the number is done first and then the - is kept afterwards.

So why is (-2)^0 positive 1 and -1^0 a negative?

Is it because we're doing the same thing by adding the - after when unenclosed with a ( ) ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
my explanation for it:

take $\frac{x^2}{x^2}$ when x is not equal to 0. obviously it's equal to 1, right? now by the law of subtraction for exponents $x^{2-2}=1$ which is $x^0=1$ this holds for all numbers
 
Last edited:
ineedhelpnow said:
my explanation for it:

take $\frac{x^2}{x^2}$ when x is not equal to 0. obviously it's equal to 1, right? now by the law of subtraction for exponents $x^{2-2}=1$ which is $x^0=1$ this holds for all numbers

More generally: Since $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{a^m}{a^n} = a^{m-n} \end{align*}$, if the powers are the same then $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{a^m}{a^m} = a^0 \end{align*}$. But the top and bottom are equal, and so they cancel leaving 1. So $\displaystyle \begin{align*} a^0 = 1 \end{align*}$.

Just note, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 0^0 \end{align*}$ is undefined.
 
OMGMathPLS said:
Why is base to power 0 always 1, even if it's .2^0 it =1?

Is it just counting the 1 time the .2 is existing? Is that why?And - base ^ 0 is negative whatever the number is so why is that not a negative one?

Because (-2)^2 is 4 but no because a negative times a negative is a positive.

And with parentheses -2^2 is -4, because the number is done first and then the - is kept afterwards.

So why is (-2)^0 positive 1 and -1^0 a negative?

Is it because we're doing the same thing by adding the - after when unenclosed with a ( ) ?
In the field of discrete mathematics a precise description of why it is $\displaystyle a^{0}=1$ no matter which is a [even a=0...] il given in...

http://mathhelpboards.com/discrete-mathematics-set-theory-logic-15/difference-equation-tutorial-draft-part-i-426.html#post2479

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
OMGMathPLS said:
So why is (-2)^0 positive 1 and -1^0 a negative?

Is it because we're doing the same thing by adding the - after when unenclosed with a ( ) ?

To answer your last question, yes, we are doing the same thing. $(-2)^0$ is simply $1$ because $(-2)^0=(-2)^{1-1}=\frac{(-2)}{(-2)}=1$. The negatives cancel out because they are enclosed in parenthesis (). However, $-1^0=(-1) \cdot 1^0$ has its negative outside the parenthesis so that operation is done last: $-1^0=(-1) \cdot 1^0=(-1) \cdot 1=-1$ :D
 
Another interpretation using the concept of empty function:

If we want $\left|Y^X\right|=\left|Y\right|^{\left|X\right|}$ to hold for $X=\emptyset,$ then,$$\left|Y\right|^0=\left|Y\right|^{\left|\emptyset\right|}=\left|Y^{\emptyset}\right|=1,\quad \forall \left|Y\right|=0,1,2,\ldots$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K