Why does the directivity of a loudspeaker change with frequency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hanson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acoustics
Click For Summary
The directivity of a loudspeaker changes with frequency due to the relationship between wavelength and the size of the speaker enclosure. At low frequencies, the sound waves are longer than the enclosure dimensions, resulting in omnidirectional sound. As frequency increases, the wavelengths become shorter, leading to a more forward-directional sound due to the enclosure's size becoming significant relative to the wavelength. The mathematical relationship involving the wave number (k) and the enclosure size (a) explains this phenomenon, particularly through the behavior of Bessel functions. Understanding these concepts often requires mathematical knowledge, but the physical implications highlight how speaker design affects sound dispersion.
hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
Can anyone explain me why the directivity of a loudspeaker varies with frequencies?
It is observed that the speaker is omni-directional at low frequencies and becomes increasingly forward-directional towards higher frequencies.
This is to due with the wavelength, but I have no clue on why it is so.

http://www.linkwitzlab.com/rooms.htm

This website mention some more observations but it doesn't provide explanaton.

Can anyone help explain me?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Google on loudspeaker directivity. There are good explanations on-line. Hint: the relation of the wavelength to the type and size of the enclosure is key.
 
I remember studying monopoles and baffled pistons and calculating the pressure fields due to them in acoustics. Big fun. One thing that I remember is that the pressure distribution is dependent on a value known as "k*a" where k is the wave number and a is some characteristic dimension of the source. The wave number is a function of freqquency and is everywhere in acoustic theory. It's pretty cool to see how a piston's (monopole) pressure field changes with varying values of ka. Take a look here, most notably under section E:

http://www.gmi.edu/~drussell/GMI-Acoustics/Directivity-Frame.html

You'll get a feeling with how the directivity changes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice link Fred. The only thing that is lacking there is this expansion of the Bessel function for large x:

J_1(x)\sim \sqrt\frac{2}{\pi x}cos (x+\pi/4)

where x=kasin\theta

Therefore, since k\sim 1/\lambda

-For a/\lambda<<1, that is for a baffle emitting with a long wave length compared with its size, the sound has no preferred direction to leading order.

-For a/\lambda>>1, the cos in the expansion of the Bessel function gets into the phase of the exponential:

P\sim F(r,x) e^{i(\omega t-kr+cos(a/\lambda sin \theta+\pi/4))}

showing the unidirectional character of the phase. That is, for large baffles compared with the wave length emitted, the sound is propagated with a preferred direction that coincides with the axis as a/\lambda>>1

I really think this makes sense physically speaking.
 
Thanks turbo, FredGarvin and Clausisus2.
wavelength and size of the enclosure?
With some search, I find the "ka" you guys mentioned.
But they are always expressed in terms of mathematical formulae that I have not yet learned before. I know the consequences of those equations but not the origin and derivation of them.

Could you offer a more physical explanation in plain terms?
Or how would you understand the phenomena without the equations?
 
Last edited:
Like I mentioned, the k is called the "wave number" and is defined as
k = \frac{\omega}{c} = \frac{2 \pi}{\lambda} where \omega is the frequency, c is the speed of sound in the medium and \lambda is the wavelength.

In plain terms this is kind of tough. A lot of times in acoustics, things don't make sense until you go through the math. The only thing I can say is that if you look at the equation that describes the far field intensity of a piston (close to a speaker in mathematical models) you will see the following:

I (r,\theta) = \frac{\rho_o c k^2 U_{rms}^2 \pi^2 a^2}{4 \pi^2 r^2}\left[ \frac{2 J_1(k a sin(\theta)}{k a sin(\theta)} \right] ^2

The second term in brackets is the directivity factor and you can see how k shows up in a lot of places. The a in this case is the piston's diameter. That directivity factor adjusts the pressure field intensity at different angles from the main axis of the piston.

Clear as mud, right?
 
Last edited:
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K