Why does the directivity of a loudspeaker change with frequency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hanson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acoustics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the variation of loudspeaker directivity with frequency, exploring the relationship between sound wavelength, speaker design, and acoustic behavior. Participants examine both theoretical and practical aspects of this phenomenon, with references to mathematical models and physical principles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that loudspeakers are omni-directional at low frequencies and become more directional at higher frequencies, suggesting a connection to wavelength.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of the relationship between wavelength and the size of the loudspeaker enclosure, hinting at further online resources for exploration.
  • A participant recalls concepts from acoustics, specifically mentioning the significance of the "k*a" parameter, where k is the wave number and a is a characteristic dimension of the loudspeaker, in determining pressure distribution and directivity.
  • Further elaboration on the Bessel function expansion is provided, indicating how directivity changes based on the ratio of baffle size to wavelength, with specific conditions outlined for both small and large baffles.
  • One participant expresses a desire for a more intuitive, non-mathematical explanation of the phenomena, indicating difficulty in grasping the concepts without the underlying equations.
  • A later reply reiterates the definition of wave number and its relation to frequency and wavelength, while also referencing the mathematical model for far field intensity of a piston, highlighting the complexity of the directivity factor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple viewpoints and models regarding the relationship between frequency, wavelength, and loudspeaker directivity. There is no consensus on a singular explanation or understanding of the phenomena, with some seeking more intuitive insights while others focus on mathematical formulations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the mathematical derivations and their physical implications, indicating a gap in understanding that may depend on prior knowledge of acoustics and related equations.

hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
Can anyone explain me why the directivity of a loudspeaker varies with frequencies?
It is observed that the speaker is omni-directional at low frequencies and becomes increasingly forward-directional towards higher frequencies.
This is to due with the wavelength, but I have no clue on why it is so.

http://www.linkwitzlab.com/rooms.htm

This website mention some more observations but it doesn't provide explanaton.

Can anyone help explain me?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Google on loudspeaker directivity. There are good explanations on-line. Hint: the relation of the wavelength to the type and size of the enclosure is key.
 
I remember studying monopoles and baffled pistons and calculating the pressure fields due to them in acoustics. Big fun. One thing that I remember is that the pressure distribution is dependent on a value known as "k*a" where k is the wave number and a is some characteristic dimension of the source. The wave number is a function of freqquency and is everywhere in acoustic theory. It's pretty cool to see how a piston's (monopole) pressure field changes with varying values of ka. Take a look here, most notably under section E:

http://www.gmi.edu/~drussell/GMI-Acoustics/Directivity-Frame.html

You'll get a feeling with how the directivity changes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice link Fred. The only thing that is lacking there is this expansion of the Bessel function for large x:

[tex]J_1(x)\sim \sqrt\frac{2}{\pi x}cos (x+\pi/4)[/tex]

where [tex]x=kasin\theta[/tex]

Therefore, since [tex]k\sim 1/\lambda[/tex]

-For [tex]a/\lambda<<1[/tex], that is for a baffle emitting with a long wave length compared with its size, the sound has no preferred direction to leading order.

-For [tex]a/\lambda>>1[/tex], the cos in the expansion of the Bessel function gets into the phase of the exponential:

[tex]P\sim F(r,x) e^{i(\omega t-kr+cos(a/\lambda sin \theta+\pi/4))}[/tex]

showing the unidirectional character of the phase. That is, for large baffles compared with the wave length emitted, the sound is propagated with a preferred direction that coincides with the axis as [tex]a/\lambda>>1[/tex]

I really think this makes sense physically speaking.
 
Thanks turbo, FredGarvin and Clausisus2.
wavelength and size of the enclosure?
With some search, I find the "ka" you guys mentioned.
But they are always expressed in terms of mathematical formulae that I have not yet learned before. I know the consequences of those equations but not the origin and derivation of them.

Could you offer a more physical explanation in plain terms?
Or how would you understand the phenomena without the equations?
 
Last edited:
Like I mentioned, the k is called the "wave number" and is defined as
[tex]k = \frac{\omega}{c} = \frac{2 \pi}{\lambda}[/tex] where [tex]\omega[/tex] is the frequency, [tex]c[/tex] is the speed of sound in the medium and [tex]\lambda[/tex] is the wavelength.

In plain terms this is kind of tough. A lot of times in acoustics, things don't make sense until you go through the math. The only thing I can say is that if you look at the equation that describes the far field intensity of a piston (close to a speaker in mathematical models) you will see the following:

[tex]I (r,\theta) = \frac{\rho_o c k^2 U_{rms}^2 \pi^2 a^2}{4 \pi^2 r^2}\left[ \frac{2 J_1(k a sin(\theta)}{k a sin(\theta)} \right] ^2[/tex]

The second term in brackets is the directivity factor and you can see how k shows up in a lot of places. The a in this case is the piston's diameter. That directivity factor adjusts the pressure field intensity at different angles from the main axis of the piston.

Clear as mud, right?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K