Why Does the ELP2000-82b Lunar Theory Differ from Jean Meeus' Adjustments?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cptolemy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lunar Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The ELP2000-82b lunar theory, programmed in a DLL, presents challenges in reducing obtained positions to the mean equinox of date due to its reference to the ELP2000 inertial frame. Simple adjustments using precession with Laskar series do not yield accurate results. Additionally, discrepancies exist between the terms used by Jean Meeus and those in the original ELP2000 theory, with Meeus achieving superior accuracy, likely due to his incorporation of lunar range finder data up to 1995 and subsequent revisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ELP2000-82b lunar theory
  • Familiarity with C++ or Fortran programming languages
  • Knowledge of astronomical precession and Laskar series
  • Experience with lunar range finder data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of the ELP2000-82b lunar theory in C++ or Fortran
  • Study the effects of precession adjustments using Laskar series on lunar position calculations
  • Examine Jean Meeus' methodologies for transforming lunar theory terms
  • Investigate the use of lunar range finder data in improving lunar position accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, software developers working on lunar theories, and researchers interested in precise lunar position calculations will benefit from this discussion.

cptolemy
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Good morning,

I was wondering if someone can help me in this subject. I recently programmed the entire ELP2000-82b lunar theory in a dll. My problem is the reduction of the obtained positions to the mean equinox of date. The theory is referred to the ELP2000 inertial frame. A simple adjustment of the longitude (in precession with Laskar series) is not giving me accurate results - beats me why...

Also, I noticed a difference between Jean Meeus terms and the original ELP. They are different. Does anyone knows what transfomations Mr. Meeus did to the terms? His results are very good even in past times.

Regards,
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I can't provide a link to a paper but I'm fairly sure that Meeus' recent work is based on lunar range finder data, initially using data up to 1995. I presume he has revisisted this since.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K