Why does the Schwinger parameter correspond to proper length?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dilatino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Parameter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Schwinger parameter, denoted as t, corresponds to the proper length of the propagator for a massive particle, as established in the discussion. The integral representation of the propagator is given by the equation $$\frac{1}{p^2 + m^2} = \int\limits_0^\infty dt \exp(-t(p^2 + m^2))$$. This relationship is derived from the interpretation of the Schwinger parameter in quantum field theory, specifically referenced in the 1951 Schwinger paper. For further clarity, resources such as the blog article by Lubos Motl and the Tangent Bundle wiki provide additional insights into this concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with the concept of propagators
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, specifically improper integrals
  • Experience with mathematical notation used in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the 1951 Schwinger paper on proper time formalism
  • Explore the derivation of propagators in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the implications of the Schwinger parameter in particle physics
  • Investigate the use of Wolfram Alpha for solving integrals in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum field theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics will benefit from this discussion.

Dilatino
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have just learned from nice article

http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/12/edward-witten-what-every-quantum.html

that the propagator of a massive particle can be rewritten as an integral over the so-called Schwinger parameter t as

$$
\frac{1}{p^2 + m^2} = \int\limits_0^\infty dt \exp(-t(p^2 + m^2))
$$

In addition, in the blog article it is said that this Schwinger parameter p can be interpreted as the proper length of the propagator. I don't see this, so can somebody give a derivation/further explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a nice clear presentation of the argument given in the 1951 Schwinger paper at http://www.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/Quantum_field_theory/Schwinger_proper_time_formalism. Post back if that doesn't help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K