Why does this amplitude not vanish by the Ward identity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the amplitude of the process e- → e-γ, specifically analyzing why certain terms do not vanish according to the Ward identity. The spin-averaged amplitude is expressed as \overline{|M|^2}=16πα(εμ₊pεν₋p' + εμ₋pεν₊p'). The violation of the Ward identity is attributed to the unphysical nature of the diagram, which does not satisfy unitarity. The discussion concludes that adding an external potential can resolve this issue, aligning the process with Bremmstrahlung.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their interpretation in quantum field theory.
  • Familiarity with the Ward identity and its implications in particle physics.
  • Knowledge of spin-averaged amplitudes and polarization vectors for massless vector bosons.
  • Basic concepts of unitarity in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Ward identity in quantum electrodynamics (QED).
  • Explore the concept of unitarity in quantum field theory and its significance.
  • Learn about Bremmstrahlung and its relation to particle interactions.
  • Investigate the role of external potentials in modifying Feynman diagrams.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and advanced students studying particle interactions and quantum electrodynamics.

weningth
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
An electron emits a photon. The amplitude for this process is calculated and then the polarisation sum for the photon is performed. However, the terms proportional to the unphysical polarisations do not vanish. Why is that?
Consider the process e^-\rightarrow e^-\gamma depicted in the following Feynman diagram.

amp_q-qg.png


The spin-averaged amplitude with linearly polarised photons is
\overline{|M|^2}=8\pi\alpha\left(-g^{\mu\nu}+\epsilon^\mu_+\epsilon^\nu_-+\epsilon^\mu_-\epsilon^\nu_+\right)\left(p_\mu p^\prime_\nu+p_\nu p^\prime_\mu-g_{\mu\nu}pp^\prime\right),
where the polarisation sum for massless vector bosons was used in terms of the unphysical polarisation vectors \epsilon_\pm=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\epsilon_t\pm\epsilon_L\right), \epsilon_t=(1,\mathbf{0}), \epsilon_L=\frac{1}{|\mathbf{k}|}(0,\mathbf{k}).

Now, by the Ward identity the parts of the amplitude of the form \epsilon^\mu_\pm M_\mu should vanish since \epsilon_+\parallel k. However, since \epsilon_+\epsilon_-=1 I find that instead
$$\overline{|M|^2}=16\pi\alpha\left(\epsilon^\mu_+p\epsilon^\nu_-p^\prime+\epsilon^\mu_-p\epsilon^\nu_+p^\prime\right).$$

I know that in general the Ward identity does not hold for individual diagrams but only for the sum of all relevant ones. However, the above diagram is the only one to this order in \alpha.

Why does the term \left(\epsilon^\mu_+\epsilon^\nu_-+\epsilon^\mu_-\epsilon^\nu_+\right)\left(p_\mu p^\prime_\nu+p_\nu p^\prime_\mu-g_{\mu\nu}pp^\prime\right) not vanish?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagram is unphysical as a standalone diagram as it violates unitarity. This is being hinted by the condition that Ward identity as an operation of Polarization vector on amplitude does not vanish. Since there are no other diagrams at level \alpha, you can not consider this diagram with both lines as external lines.

You can however add an external potential to the diagram to make it unitary and the process will be similar to Bremmstrahlung.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weningth and vanhees71
Great answer! Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
967
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
948
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K