Why Don't Photons Get Absorbed in Double Slit Experiments?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of photons in the double slit experiment, specifically why they do not get absorbed in the separation between the slits. It is established that while many photons are absorbed by the material surrounding the slits, those that are not absorbed maintain their wavefunction, allowing for the interference pattern to emerge. The typical parameters discussed include a wavelength of approximately 0.5 µm and a slit separation of around 25 µm, which is significantly wider than the wavelength. The interference pattern is a result of the wavefunction's ability to exist simultaneously at both slits, leading to self-interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment and its implications in physics.
  • Knowledge of wavefunction behavior and collapse in quantum systems.
  • Basic concepts of photon behavior and absorption in materials.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formulation of wavefunctions in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of wave-particle duality in experimental physics.
  • Learn about the role of slit width and separation in interference patterns.
  • Investigate the effects of different materials on photon absorption and transmission.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational experiments that illustrate the principles of wave-particle duality and quantum behavior of light.

alex440
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi
maybe I'm asking a stupid question, I'm a layman, and i didn't succeed to google out the answer.

while performing single photon double slit experiment,
why the photons don't just get absorbed in the separation between the slits, like they do in the screen behind.

and consequently, what is the maximum width of the slit so we keep seeing interference pattern.

in typical experiment the wavelength is around 0.5 \mum and the separation is around 25\mum, which is 50 times wider.

the only answer i found on the topic is this: http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=7209", but it's hard to comprehend

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


alex440 said:
while performing single photon double slit experiment,
why the photons don't just get absorbed in the separation between the slits, like they do in the screen behind.

Most of them do get absorbed not only by the material that separates the slits, but also by the material surrounding the slits.

Take a laser beam and shine it on a wall. You get a bright spot on the wall. Now put into the beam an opaque slide with two narrow slits that are separated by less than the diameter of the beam. The resulting interference pattern is much fainter than the original spot.
 


hi jtbell

well, you mean that single photons are not going the same line, each one is going at a different angle, or in different parallel lines.

those of them who are absorbed, we "lose" them, but those who don't, their wavefunction appears at the both slits.

so that if we'd close the slits, we'd see it absorbed at the place of the left or the right slit, but not at the center.

or, if we'd manage to fire protons with exactness comparable to the slits geometry, we'd get the interference only when we fire them directly in the direction of one of the slits, but not into the the separation.

say, we fire a photon in the direction of the right slit. we fire it from the middle between the slits, at a considerable distance.

in this case, after we fire a photon, his wavefunction probability is 100% on the right slit and 0% on the left slit (as at each other point in space)

but the function itself exists, and does not collapse, since his state did not change.

so the left slit alters the function in such a manner, that it behaves like it has 2 sources now, and it can interfere with itself.

the function collapses only if it has a subject to contact in a nonzero probability location. and it will collapse only in a number of cases predicted by a probability in this location.

thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K