Why is anti-neutrino called so?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DrDu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the naming of the anti-neutrino and its relation to the conservation of leptonic charge in beta decay. Participants explore the historical context, definitions, and implications of lepton number conservation within the framework of weak interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the anti-neutrino was named to reflect its role in conserving leptonic charge during beta decay, where a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an anti-neutrino.
  • One participant explains that the lepton number is defined as +1 for leptons and -1 for antileptons, suggesting that this number is conserved in weak interactions.
  • Another participant raises the point that while lepton number conservation is a strong hypothesis, it has not been observed to be violated, although there are theoretical possibilities for such violations due to anomalies.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for lepton number violations and the implications of proton decay, which would violate both baryon and lepton number, yet respects the difference B-L.
  • One participant inquires about the symmetry behind the conservation of leptonic and baryonic charge in the standard model.
  • A later reply indicates that this conservation is associated with a global symmetry involving U(1) transformations for leptons and hadrons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the role of leptonic charge conservation in the naming of the anti-neutrino, but there are multiple views regarding the implications of lepton number conservation and the potential for its violation. The discussion remains unresolved on the broader implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that lepton number is not conserved per family or flavor due to neutrino oscillations, and there are unresolved questions about the potential for anomalies to violate lepton number conservation.

DrDu
Science Advisor
Messages
6,423
Reaction score
1,004
From what I know of the history of the neutrino, it was first postulated by Pauli to explain momentum conservation in the beta decay. However, nowadays we call the particle emitted in that process anti-neutrino and not neutrino. What is the reasoning behind this change of naming?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reasoning is the conservation of leptonic charge.

Start with a free neutron : there is no lepton. It decays into a proton, plus an electron (which conserve electric charge; the electron is a lepton), plus an anti-neutrino (which carries negative leptonic number).

In the Feynman diagram
[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Beta_Negative_Decay.svg[/URL]
you can also see the lepton number "carried in" along the arrow by the anti-neutrino, and "carried away" by the electron. By the same token, the hadronic number is conserved along the d->u line. I hope the diagram is not confusing. The anti-neutrino is really outgoing with positive energy, it is represented as a neutrino in-going (backwards in time) with negative energy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you humanino!
I understand more or less the reasoning, although I cannot see (but imagine) the diagramm.
How is leptonic charge being defined? Is it a conserved charge of the weak interaction?
 
The lepton number is an additive quantum number which is +1 for leptons (electron, muon, tau and their neutrinos) and -1 for antileptons. You may just count them in the initial and final state, and expect this number to be conserved, included in weak interactions.

First note however that this number is already known not to be conserved per family or flavor, as massive neutrinos can oscillate from one flavor to another.

Even worse, although the total number of leptons however has (AFAIK) never been observed to be violated, in principle it could be by very tiny effects called anomalies (the breaking of classical symmetries by quantum effects or loops), even within the standard model. Since it has never been observed, keep in mind that taking lepton number as conserved is an excellent working hypothesis. Effects in which it could be violated also occur beyond the standard model. For instance, there are searches for proton decay into neutral pion plus positron, which violates both baryon and lepton number. Note however that this reaction which has never been observed despite intense searches respects the difference B-L, which in fact is protected against anomalies within the standard model and also respected in many models beyond the standard one.

See also :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepton_number
 
Is there a (possibly only approximate) symmetry behind the conservation of leptonic and baryonic charge in the standard model?
 
Yes, this is a global symmetry consisting in multiplying all leptons (or hadrons) by a pure phase, so those are two U(1). This is described for instance in
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0410370v2
 

Similar threads

Graduate Beta Decay, why did they have to resort to Neutrinos?
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
Undergrad How Does Beta Decay Relate to the Role of W Bosons in Weak Nuclear Force?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Undergrad Unraveling Neutrino Confusion: Ettore Majorana's Theory
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Undergrad Majorana Neutrinos: Evidence of Particle vs. Antiparticle?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Graduate Why do the proton and electron have equal and opposite electric charge?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
High School What does QFT really predict about matter/anti-matter interactions?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad "Thermal" neutrino generation?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Graduate IceCube rules out last SM explanation of ANITA’s anomalous neutrinos
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Undergrad How do neutrinos conserve angular momentum?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Why are Beryllium-7 neutrinos monoenergetic?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K