A Why Is Dissociation Rate Proportional to Current Raised to the Power of N?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Piki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Process
Piki
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Dissociation rate vs. current
Hello everyone,

I am looking for a simple intuitive explenation why the disociation rate is proportional to current^(N) where N determines the N-electron process in Fig. 4 of this article:
B. C. Stipe, M. A. Rezaei, W. Ho, S. Gao, M. Persson, and B. I. Lundqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett.
78, 4410 (1997)

Thank you and regards

Bipp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ityThe explanation for why the dissociation rate is proportional to current^(N) is that the more electrons that are involved in the process, the faster the reaction will occur. This is because the electrons must all be in the same place at the same time to initiate the reaction. When there are more electrons involved, they can interact with each other in more complex ways, leading to a faster reaction rate. Additionally, when there are more electrons, the current they create is stronger, which also increases the reaction rate.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
12K
Back
Top