asdf1
- 734
- 0
in a crystal, when proving the debye frequency, why is the existence of longitudinal lattice ignored? why is there longitudinal lattice in the first place?
The discussion revolves around the concept of Debye frequency in the context of crystal lattices, specifically questioning the treatment of longitudinal lattice modes in the proof of Debye frequency. Participants are exploring the relevance and implications of longitudinal lattice structures in this context.
The conversation is ongoing, with some participants seeking clarification on the definitions and implications of longitudinal lattices. There is a mix of inquiries about references and assertions regarding the treatment of longitudinal modes in Debye's calculations.
One participant mentions a specific reference, "Physical Metallurgy Principles" by Reed, but there is a call for more precise citations. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the assumptions made in the original proof and the definitions being used.
That's not enough. You must provide the exact quote from Reed-Hill.i think it's in "physical metallogy principles" by reed