Why is magnesium an NMDA antagonist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mycotheology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnesium
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The NMDA receptor functions as a ligand-gated non-selective cation channel, allowing the passage of Na+, Ca2+, and K+. Magnesium ions (Mg2+) act as NMDA antagonists by clogging the receptor's pore, effectively blocking ion flow in a voltage-dependent manner. This occurs due to Mg2+'s smaller size and higher charge-to-radius ratio compared to calcium ions (Ca2+), which makes Mg2+ more effective at deactivating the receptor. The discussion highlights the physiological role of magnesium in modulating NMDA receptor activity, supported by research indicating that magnesium concentrations reduce NMDA responses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of NMDA receptor function
  • Knowledge of ion channel dynamics
  • Familiarity with voltage-dependent ion gating
  • Basic concepts of ionic charge and size
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of NMDA receptor modulation by magnesium
  • Explore the role of voltage-gating in ion channels
  • Investigate the physiological effects of magnesium on neurotransmission
  • Learn about the implications of NMDA receptor antagonism in neuropharmacology
USEFUL FOR

Neuroscientists, pharmacologists, and anyone interested in the biochemical mechanisms of neurotransmission and the role of magnesium in neural activity.

mycotheology
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
The NMDA receptor is a ligand gated non selective cation channel. It allows Na+ and to a lesser extent Ca2+ and K+ to pass through. I read that Mg2+ clogs up the pore. Why would Mg2+ block the channel but not Ca2+? Ca2+ is larger so I'd expect that to be more likely to block an ion channel. Is it because Mg2+ is more electronegative than Ca2+?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
mycotheology said:
The NMDA receptor is a ligand gated non selective cation channel. It allows Na+ and to a lesser extent Ca2+ and K+ to pass through. I read that Mg2+ clogs up the pore. Why would Mg2+ block the channel but not Ca2+? Ca2+ is larger so I'd expect that to be more likely to block an ion channel. Is it because Mg2+ is more electronegative than Ca2+?

I'd say its because Mg2+ is the smallest charge 2 ion and is more reactive than Ca2+; clogging up the pore might just mean that it deactivates the protein, not actually block the pore, right? Just my opinion, I'm no expert.
 
Heres a quote from an abstract:
Physiological concentrations of magnesium reduce responses to N M D A by blocking the NMDA-associated ionophore in a voltage-dependent manner [2].
deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/28723/1/0000544.pdf

In a voltage dependent manner so what you said must be correct. Magnesiums size-charge ratio is behind it. I read something about NMDA receptors being partially voltage gated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
956
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
20K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K