Why is My MCNP Burnup Calculation Failing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rafimah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mcnp Simulation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on troubleshooting a burnup calculation failure in MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code). The user encountered a "geometry error: no cell found" message, indicating that the simulation could not locate the defined geometry. The solution involves ensuring proper void cell specification using the union operator (1:2:-3) to encompass all irrelevant space around the pellet. Additionally, placing the pellet in a reflecting box is recommended for achieving a repeated geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code) version 6.2
  • Understanding of geometry definitions in MCNP simulations
  • Knowledge of void cell specifications and the union operator
  • Basic principles of nuclear engineering and burnup calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research MCNP geometry definitions and common errors
  • Learn about void cell specifications and the use of the union operator in MCNP
  • Explore methods for creating repeated geometries in MCNP
  • Study burnup calculation techniques in nuclear reactor simulations
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, MCNP users, and anyone involved in simulating burnup calculations in nuclear reactors will benefit from this discussion.

Rafimah
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
I'm trying to learn to calculate burnup in MCNP but I'm having some difficulties
Hi everyone, I'm a newbie to MCNP, I'm trying to calculate burnup for this pellet I include here in a PWR in an infinitely repeated geometry, but it seems to be failing for some reason. I get the error message:

ctm = 0.00 nrn = 0
dump 1 on file runtpp.h5 nps = 0 coll = 0
source distribution written to file srcte cycle= 0
xact is done
cp0 = 0.18
Geometry error: no cell found.
run terminated because 10 particles got lost.
=====> 4.05 M histories/hr (based on wall-clock time in mcrun)
warning. 10 particles got lost
warning. no final keff estimate made because no active cycles run.
ctm = 0.00 nrn = 189
dump 2 on file runtpp.h5 nps = 10 coll = 0
mcrun is done

Can anyone help me out with this? I imagine it has to do with the "geometry error: no cell found" line but I don't understand the issue. The cell seems alright to me and the ksrc point is inside the cylinder.

Any help would be very appreciated!
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
"20 0 1 2 -3"
This is the void, so it needs to be all space you don't care about. Everything above AS WELL AS everything below AS WELL AS everything outside the cylinder. So you need the union operator :
Code:
1:2:-3
As a rule of thumb, expect to use the union operator a lot in the void cell specification. I've not checked anything else and this is not yet a repeated geometry, the simplest way to do that would be to put the pellet in a reflecting box.

I was going to welcome you to PF, but unusually for an MCNP question you have other posts. Welcome to Nuclear Engineering anyway @Rafimah !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpp

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
318
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
19K