The discussion centers around the nature of locality in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) compared to nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics, particularly in the context of entanglement and relativistic principles. Participants explore the implications of locality in QFT, its mathematical formulation, and the philosophical interpretations of locality and non-locality.
Participants express differing views on the interpretation of locality and non-locality in the context of QFT and entanglement. There is no consensus on the implications of entanglement for the concept of locality, with some asserting that it does not contradict locality while others argue that it does.
The discussion highlights the complexity of defining locality in quantum theories, particularly the dependence on specific definitions and interpretations within different scientific communities. The terms "local" and "non-local" are used variably, leading to potential misunderstandings.
Could you give some references?Kolmo said:Regarding (b), all GPTs allow updating but by "Bayesian" we mean there is a unique way to update in late of data. In GPTs going beyond the Tsirelson bound ##2\sqrt{2}## there is an element of arbitrary choice in how one updates in light of data. This is what leads to a recent phrase: it's the most general GPT where one can still learn.
(b) is a corollary of (a) so it is simpler to see the proof of (a) first.atyy said:Could you give some references?
To be more explicit there is also also a third condition proved to be equivalent in this paper, so the full list is that the theory is obeys the following which are all equivalent:atyy said:Could you give some references?