A Why is Quantum Field Theory Local?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local Qft
Click For Summary
Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is considered local because it ensures that measurements at spacelike separated points do not influence each other, maintaining causality in accordance with special relativity. This locality is defined mathematically, where local observables commute at spacelike separations, preventing faster-than-light communication. The confusion arises from different interpretations of "local" and "nonlocal," particularly regarding quantum entanglement, which some physicists label as evidence of nonlocality. However, in the context of QFT, entangled states do not imply nonlocal interactions but rather inseparability within a single quantum system. Overall, QFT's structure inherently supports locality while accommodating the complexities of quantum entanglement.
  • #181
Kolmo said:
Regarding (b), all GPTs allow updating but by "Bayesian" we mean there is a unique way to update in late of data. In GPTs going beyond the Tsirelson bound ##2\sqrt{2}## there is an element of arbitrary choice in how one updates in light of data. This is what leads to a recent phrase: it's the most general GPT where one can still learn.
Could you give some references?
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #183
atyy said:
Could you give some references?
To be more explicit there is also also a third condition proved to be equivalent in this paper, so the full list is that the theory is obeys the following which are all equivalent:

(a) The most general theory satisfying the Exclusion principle. Namely that if each of the pairs from a set of observables ##A,B,C## are compatible/co-measurable, then the whole set is co-measurable

(b) The most general one that permits Bayesian updating.

(c) The most general one which assigns probabilities to any repeatable ideal measurements.

(a) was originally a conjecture of Ernst Specker. Cabello proved (c) implies (a) and from there proves (a) in the paper I linked. After that he later proved (b) in (PDF free access):
https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.042001.
 
  • Informative
Likes bhobba and kith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
466
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 113 ·
4
Replies
113
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K