Why is Simple Inequality True?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the inequality involving the sums of absolute differences and their relationship to the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. Participants explore various proofs and methods to understand why the inequality holds, delving into mathematical reasoning and different approaches to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for clarification on the inequality involving sums of absolute differences and its validity.
  • Another participant identifies the inequality as a special case of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, providing its general form.
  • A follow-up question is posed regarding the existence of more insightful proofs beyond the standard explanation.
  • A participant suggests multiple methods to prove the inequality, including the generalized mean inequality (AM-QM inequality) and a rearrangement approach.
  • There is mention of a geometric reasoning related to the length of a vector formed by the absolute differences.
  • A participant expresses appreciation for the detailed responses and acknowledges their helpfulness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the inequality as a special case of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, but there is no consensus on the most insightful proof or method, as various approaches are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some methods presented rely on specific assumptions about the non-negativity of the terms involved, and the discussion includes various mathematical techniques that may not be universally applicable without further conditions.

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Can anybody tell me why

[tex]\sum_{j=1}^p |x_j-y_j| \leq \left( \sum_{j=1}^p 1\right)^{1/2} \left( \sum_{j=1}^p |x_j-y_j|^2 \right)^{1/2}[/tex]

is true?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a special case of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality which in the finite-dimensional real case state:
[tex]\sum_{i=1}^n a_i b_i \leq \left( \sum_{i=1}^n a_i^2 \right)^{1/2} \left( \sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2 \right)^{1/2}[/tex]
For all real numbers a_i, b_i.
 
Oh, thank you very much :)

Just as a little side-Q: Since this is a special case, as you say, are there also some more insightful proofs? Or is it too abstract for that?
 
There are plenty of ways to show it.

For simplicity let [itex]z_n = |x_n-y_n|[/itex] (no need to keep track of both x_j and y_j).

Method 1 (means):
The generalized mean inequality says that:
[tex]M_p(a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n) = \left(\frac{a_1^p + a_2^p + \cdots + a_n^p}{n}\right)^{1/p}[/tex]
Is increasing as a function of p if a_1, ..., a_n are non-negative numbers. In particular:

[tex]M_1(z_j) =\frac{\sum_{j=1}^p z_j }{p} \leq \left(\frac{\sum_{j=1}^p z_j^2}{p}\right)^{1/2} = M_2(z_j)[/tex]
(this is often referred to as the AM-QM inequality since M_1 is called the Arithmetic Mean and M_2 is called the Quadratic Mean).
[EDIT: Note also that the AM-QM inequality is practically the same as yours so if you want more proofs just search for proofs of the AM-QM inequality]Method 2 (rearrangement and fiddling with indices):
Assume without loss of generality [itex]z_1 \leq z_2 \leq \cdots \leq z_p[/itex] (otherwise just rearrange the sequence). You wish to show:
[tex]\left(\sum_{j=1}^p z_j \right)^2 \leq p \left( \sum_{j=1}^p z_j^2 \right)[/tex]
We can extend the sequence z_n to all integer indices by letting [itex]z_{np+k} = z_k[/itex] for all integers n and k (in other words we just extend it by letting z_{p+1} = z_1, z_{p+2} = z_2, ...).

You have
[tex]\left(\sum_{j=1}^p z_j \right)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^p \sum_{j=1}^{p} z_i z_j = \sum_{i=1}^p \sum_{j=1}^{p} z_jz_{j+i}[/tex]

By the rearrangement inequality:
[tex]\sum_{j=1}^{p} z_jz_{j+i} \leq \sum_{j=1}^{p} z_j^2[/tex]
So:
[tex]\sum_{i=1}^p \sum_{j=1}^{p} z_jz_{j+i} \leq \sum_{i=1}^p\sum_{j=1}^{p} z_j^2 = p\sum_{j=1}^{p} z_j^2[/tex]I also guess there is a way to reason geometrically since:
[tex]\left(\sum_{j=1}^p z_j^2\right)^{1/2}[/tex]
is the length of the vector (z_1,z_2,...,z_j).
 
Last edited:
My apologies for not having replied sooner! I have read this much earlier, but just remembered I had forgotten to reply!

Thank you very much, it's rare to get such a helpful post, was exactly what I was looking for :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
30K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K