Why is Technetium (Element 43) radioactive?

In summary,It seems odd to me that there would be a radioactive atom so far up the periodic table. What is it about this atom's atomic nucleus that makes it so unstable?All (?) elements have radioactive isotopes. What is unusual is that elements 43 and 61 are the only elements with atomic number < 82 that have no stable isotope.The lack of stable odd isotopes for elements 18 and 58 is just as odd as their lack for elements 43 and 61.
  • #1
108
1
It seems odd to me that there would be a radioactive atom so far up the periodic table. What is it about this atom's atomic nucleus that makes it so unstable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
According to the liquid-drop-model of nuclei the most stable isotope would be 100-Tc. But with two odd numbers of protons (43) and neutrons (57) it could only be stable if there weren't other stable nuclei with two even numbers of protons and neutrons, which are 100-Mo (42/58) and 100-Ru (44/56). The second is stable and the first almost ##(7.3 \cdot 10^{18}a)##. (Also a consequence of this model, however, I haven't found a short way to see it.)
Thus the heavy isotopes decay per neutron emission and the lighter per electron capture.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
  • #3
Did you check the Wikipedia page? It has a good introduction. There are several factors, mainly the very low energy of nuclei of elements nearby combined with the odd number of protons of technetium.
 
  • #4
mfb said:
Did you check the Wikipedia page? It has a good introduction. There are several factors, mainly the very low energy of nuclei of elements nearby combined with the odd number of protons of technetium.
I have taken the German one and wrote a kind of summarization. Unfortunately the English site wasn't as detailed concerning the radioactivity of the isotopes. The good thing is, I learned something about the stability of nuclei myself.

Edit: the 100-Tc was a result from a formula on the liquid-drop-model page plus Wolfram.
 
  • #5
WCOLtd said:
It seems odd to me that there would be a radioactive atom so far up the periodic table. What is it about this atom's atomic nucleus that makes it so unstable?
All (?) elements have radioactive isotopes.
WCOLtd said:
It seems odd to me that there would be a radioactive atom so far up the periodic table. What is it about this atom's atomic nucleus that makes it so unstable?
All (?) elements have radioactive isotopes. What is unusual is that elements 43 and 61 are the only elements with atomic number < 82 that have no stable isotope.
 
  • Like
Likes WCOLtd
  • #6
Is it pure random chance that elements 43 and 61 don't have any stable isotopes, or is there any more reason?
From elements 1 to 16, every element has exactly 1 stable odd isotope. Starting with 17, the pattern gets more random:
17: 2 - 35, 37
18: 0
19: 2 - 39, 41
20: 1 - 43
21: 1 - 45
22: 2 - 47, 49
23: 1 - 51
24: 1 - 53
25: 1 - 55
26: 1 - 57
27: 1 - 59
28: 1 - 61
29: 2 - 63, 65
30: 1 - 67
31: 2 - 69, 71
32: 1 - 73
33: 1 - 75
34: 1 - 77
35: 1 - 79, 81
36: 1 - 83
37: 1 - 85
38: 1 - 87
39: 1 - 89
40: 1 - 91
41: 1 - 93
42: 2 - 95, 97
43: 0
44: 2 - 99, 101
45: 1 - 103
46: 1 - 105
47: 2 - 107, 109
48: 1 - 111
49: 1 - 113
50: 3 - 115, 117, 119
51: 2 - 121, 123
52: 1 - 125
53: 1 - 127
54: 2 - 129, 131
55: 1 - 133
56: 2 - 135, 137
57: 1 - 139
58: 0
59: 1 - 141
60: 2 - 143, 145
61: 0
62: 2 - 147, 149
63: 2 - 151, 153
64: 2 - 155, 157
65: 1 - 159
66: 2 - 161, 163
67: 1 - 165
68: 1 - 167
69: 1 - 169
70: 2 - 171, 173
71: 1 - 175
72: 2 - 177, 179
73: 1 - 181
74: 1 - 183
75: 1 - 185
76: 2 - 187, 189
77: 2 - 191, 193
78: 1 - 195
79: 1 - 197
80: 2 - 199, 201
81: 2 - 203, 205
82: 1 - 207
83: 1 - 209.

The absence of stable odd isotopes of elements 18 and 58 is just as odd as their absence for elements 43 and 61.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
snorkack said:
Is it pure random chance that elements 43 and 61 don't have any stable isotopes, or is there any more reason?
As far as I can see it, the liquid-drop-model is - as quoted - semi-empirical, i.e. it takes the observations and tries to explain them by patterns. Those patterns represent the more general principle, that nature always tries to find local energy minima, stable points of balance where energy from elsewhere is needed to leave those states. Since all three atomic forces play a role here the overall situation can be pretty complex. The patterns mentioned in the liquid-drop-model are meant to reduce this complexity onto computational principles. And it works astonishingly well as I experienced as I took them to calculate 100-Tc as a preferred state.
 
  • #8
snorkack said:
The absence of stable odd isotopes of elements 18 and 58 is just as odd as their absence for elements 43 and 61.
All the odd isotopes argon. scnr.

It is not that odd for the even-numbered elements - 37Ar would have 19 neutrons, 39Ar would have 21 neutrons. 20 is a magic number (the nuclear equivalent of noble gases - completed shells), so 37Cl and 39K are strongly bound, and the argon isotopes decay to those.

139Ce has 81 neutrons, 141 has 83. And 82 is a magic number again.

While the Wikipedia page about technetium is a bit short, the linked article isotopes of technetium has more details.

Magic numbers for reference: 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126
 
  • #9
mfb said:
It is not that odd for the even-numbered elements - 37Ar would have 19 neutrons, 39Ar would have 21 neutrons. 20 is a magic number (the nuclear equivalent of noble gases - completed shells), so 37Cl and 39K are strongly bound, and the argon isotopes decay to those.

139Ce has 81 neutrons, 141 has 83. And 82 is a magic number again.

Magic numbers for reference: 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126
Then why are 55 and 85 the preferred neutron numbers, seeing how both are odd?
 
  • #10
Preferred in which way, and where do those numbers come from?

Cerium has the most stable isotope at 82 neutrons, 78, 80 and 84 neutrons also lead to isotopes without observed decay.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
Preferred in which way, and where do those numbers come from?
Technetium has no stable isotope because both 97 and 99 are unstable. For 97, the stable isobar is Mo, with 55 neutrons. For 99, the stable isobar is Ru, also with 55 neutrons. What´s special about 55 neutrons?
Promethium has no stable isotopes because both 145 and 147 are unstable. For 145, the stable isobar is Nd, with 85 neutrons. For 147, the stable isobar is Sm, also with 85 neutrons.
 
  • #12
It's not the 55 neutrons, it's the paired 42 and 44 protons. There can be only one stable isotope with an odd sum of protons and neutrons, in both cases the elements nearby have a slightly lower energy. Same for promethium.
 
  • #13
mfb said:
It's not the 55 neutrons, it's the paired 42 and 44 protons. There can be only one stable isotope with an odd sum of protons and neutrons, in both cases the elements nearby have a slightly lower energy.

Are 43 and 44 then both magic numbers?
 
  • #14
None of them is magic, see above. But paired protons and neutrons in general lead to lower energies, and in this case the paired protons win by a small margin.
 
  • #15
Thank you for the replies I especially learned much about the liquid drop model. Very useful explination.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2

1. Why is Technetium radioactive?

Technetium (Element 43) is radioactive because it has an unstable nucleus. It has an imbalance of protons and neutrons, making it energetically unstable. To become stable, Technetium releases energy in the form of radiation.

2. What causes Technetium to be radioactive?

The instability of Technetium's nucleus is caused by its atomic structure. With 43 protons and varying numbers of neutrons, the nucleus is not balanced enough to maintain its stability, leading to the release of radiation.

3. How long does Technetium remain radioactive?

Technetium has a relatively short half-life, meaning it decays at a faster rate compared to other radioactive elements. Its most stable isotope, Technetium-98, has a half-life of only 4.2 million years. This means that after this time, only half of the original amount of Technetium-98 will remain, making it less radioactive.

4. Can Technetium be found naturally occurring?

No, Technetium is not found in nature in significant amounts. It is a man-made element that was first produced by scientists in 1937. It is usually produced in nuclear reactors and can also be found in small traces in uranium ores.

5. What are the uses of radioactive Technetium?

Technetium is commonly used in medical imaging, such as bone scans and heart imaging, due to its ability to emit gamma rays. It is also used in industrial applications, such as detecting leaks in pipelines and analyzing corrosion in oil refineries.

Suggested for: Why is Technetium (Element 43) radioactive?

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
977
Replies
11
Views
878
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top